Showing : 61-70 of 114 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(3), 18, 22, 24A(2)-- Complaint - Admissibility of complaint - District Forum u/s 12(3), State Commission u/s 18 of the Act and National Commission u/s 22 of the Act are competent to decide the admissibility of complaint - If complaint does not disclose any grievance which can be redressed then concerned forum can..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 2(g)-- Deficiency of service - Allotment of land to co-operative societies for construction of flats for allotment of same to its members - Some members sought refund of earnest money - Refund allowed after deducting 10 percent from earnest money - Aggrieved members approached the Consumer Forum -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 2(d)(ii)-- Chandigarh administration allotted land to co-operative societies for constructing flats to be allotted to the members - No direct contact between Chandigarh administration and members of the societies - Whether members are covered by the definition of `consumer' under Section 2(d)(ii) of the Act..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12-- Complaint maintainability - Plot allotment - Non completion of construction - Non construction fee - Raising of demand by appellant/OP Improvement Trust - Held that the Fora under the CP Act have no jurisdiction to decide the correctness of the composition fee/non - construction fee etc. -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12-- Date of birth - Correction in matriculation certificate - Maintainability of complaint - Before going into the issue of correctness of date of birth recorded in matriculation certification, District Forum has to decide whether so called failure to make correction amounted to deficiency of service..........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12-- Complaint - Dismissal in limine - On the ground that it has not been disclosed in the complaint as to what items were being carried in the luggage and no documents were filed to show that any complaint for the missing luggage was given to the OP by the complainant - Order of dismissal at the stage..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3, 12-- Additional remedy - Complaint maintainability - Insurance contract - Dispute regarding insurance claims under Scheme - Plea that since civil suit already pending between the parties before Civil Court respondent - complaint had no right to file the complaints u/s 12 of the CP Act before the..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(3) , 24A-- Limitation - Complaint - Dismissal in limine - The claim of the complainant repudiated vide letter dated 13.1.2006 - Complaint filed on 23.4.2009 - The complaint was certainly beyond limitation period of two years as envisaged u/s 24A of the CP Act - Order passed by the District Forum dismissing..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12-- Deficiency in service - Purchase of truck in an auction - Deposit of amount - Delivery of truck after six months - No reason for delay - Moreover necessary document of truck not delivered - It amounts to deficiency of service - Appellant suffered loss of earning - Amount of compensation enhanced..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12 , 21-- Complaint - Dismissal in limine - On ground that question involves questions which were contentious before issuing any notice to the respondent - Held that the decision arrived at by the Commission premature - The Commission ought to have issued notice to the respondent and placed the pleadings on..........

Showing : 61-70 of 114 Results