Showing : 1-7 of 7 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33(4), 73-- Rent deed - Failure to produce original - Collector proceeded to determine deficiency on basis of copy of instrument - Not erroneous...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35-- Photo copy of an instrument cannot be tendered in evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 48B-- Insufficiently stamped document - When noticed from copy of any instrument - Collector may call for the original document for inspection, and on failure o produce the original instrument can presume that proper stamp duty is not paid on the original document and thus recover the same from the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33, 38(2), 40-- Xerox copy - Need not to be taken into consideration either for the purpose of impounding or for the purpose of sending the same to the competent authority under the Stamp Act - It is only the original instrument that is required to be stamped or impounded...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35, 36-- Copy of document - Cannot be called an instrument, as such is not required to be stamped - S.36 speaks of original document itself - A combined reading of Ss.35 & 36 envisages original document to be stamped and not a copy of the original for the purpose of Stamp Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code-- Order 18 - Additional evidence to produce copies of judgment and decree of Civil Court and a copy of instrument of partition besides copy of order dismissing suit filed by defendant - Copies of judgment and decree of Civil Court per se admissible in evidence - Instrument of partition - Cannot be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1985
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 97-- Condonation of delay in filing preemption suit - Not permissible - Limitation for pre-emption suit - One year computed from the time when instrument of sale registered - Not from the date on which pre-emptor plaintiff came to know of registration of instrument - Sale-deed registered at Delhi under..........

Showing : 1-7 of 7 Results