Showing : 2531-2540 of 16931 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 44, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 3(1)-- Indigent person - Presentation of application - Inquiry - Where applicants filed affidavit stating that they have not ceased to be indigent persons, since the date of decree appealed from, no further inquiry in respect of question whether or not the applicants are indigent persons shall be..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 19, Order 7, Rule 10-- Return of plaint - Lack of territorial jurisdiction - Suit for damages - Plaintiff suffered injury at the time of his birth at Nahan, however, he actually suffered loss at Shimla as well - Initial wrong thus, done at Nahan but its resulting effects and damages/tortuous act of defendants also..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 44, Rule 3-- Indigent person - Inquiry as to - Unless the Government Pleader or respondent disputes the truth of statement in affidavit, no such inquiry into the question whether or not the applicant is an indigent person, is necessary...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 44, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 3(1)-- Appeal by an indigent person - Unless the provisions, including the presentation of application dealing with the suits by indigent persons are applicable, an application for allowing to appeal as an indigent person need not comply with provisions in O.33.R.3 CPC with regard to presentation of..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Restraining appellant from interfering peaceful possession and enjoyment of `A' schedule property - Plaintiff failed to show any semblance of evidence that he is in possession of `A' schedule property - Even on the contrary, plaintiff suffered adverse findings in this..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 152-- Correction of decree - Decree can be corrected only when there is clerical or arithmetical mistake or error arising from any accidental slip or omission on the part of Court - Mistake committed by litigating parties cannot be corrected u/s 152 CPC...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-- Additional evidence - Written statement was filed by authorized signatory - Resolution authorizing defendant to file written statement could not be placed on record - In order to avoid technical objection, placing on record the resolutions by way of additional evidence does not tantamount to..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 97, 101-- Execution - Objection by sub-tenant - Sub-tenants in wrongful possession of suit property has successfully dragged the proceeding for more than three decades by taking undue advantage of procedural complications - Frivolous defences and frivolous litigation is calculated in the case - Long..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Disobedience of injunction decree - Decree holder has alternative remedy U.O.21 CPC - Application dismissed - Order upheld...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1-- Review - For review purpose an error must be apparent on the face of record...........

Showing : 2531-2540 of 16931 Results