Showing : 2491-2500 of 20116 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9-- Application U.O.26.R.9 CPC, is not to be allowed at whims of parties - Satisfaction has to be that of Court and though said satisfaction of Court can also not be arbitrary, but then there has to be cogent material on record placed by applicant to satisfy Court that appointment of Local..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 10A-- Scientific investigation - Court in its discretion, can issue a commission at any stage of the proceedings...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9-- Appointment of Local Commissioner - At appellate stage - Appellate Court does not deem it fit to appoint Local Commissioner for demarcation of suit land, as no such application filed either before trial Court or before appellate Court - Even no explanation given for the same - Moreover, misleading..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 10A-- Scientific investigation - DNA Test - Paternity - DNA Test is not only scientific but more conclusive test or method to determine the question of paternity...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second appeal - Substantial question of law - Misleading substantial questions of law were framed and in fact not borne out from either records of case or from adjudications made by both Courts below - Second appeal dismissed...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 10A-- Scientific investigation - DNA Test - Paternity - Disputed by father - It is difficult nay impossible for the party alleging such paternity to prove it without any scientific investigation - It is a tumultuous task to prove such fact and equally intricate question for the Court to answer - But for..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(r)-- Ad interim injunction - Order to issue notice to the opposite party - Order is not appealable...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 13, 9, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 35-- Foreign judgment - Termination of marriage - Challenged on the ground that order is without jurisdiction, having been obtained by fraud and being violative of rules of natural justice and the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Provision of S.34 Specific Relief Act enable the petitioner to..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 3-- Ad interim injunction - Order to issue notice to the opposite party - Mandate of O.39.R.3 is issuance of notice unless Court records reasons for coming to the conclusion that object of ranting injunction would be defeated - No illegality committed in order to issue notice to the opposite party -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 18, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8-- Order allowing impleadment of a party - Memo of parties not amended as directed by Court - Plaintiff absent - Suit dismissed - Non consideration of counter claim of third party - No prejudice caused to third party if their counter claim is not adjudicated in absence of plaintiff and for non..........

Showing : 2491-2500 of 20116 Results