Showing : 71-80 of 611 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 19, 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Matrimonial case - Transfer of case - Transfer of case is not always a solution acceptable to both the parties - It may be appropriate that available technology of video conferencing is used where both the parties have equal difficulty and there is no place which is convenient to both the parties...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 19, 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Transfer of case - Matrimonial matters - Directions issued: (i) that in matrimonial or custody matters or in proceedings between parties to a marriage or arising out of disputes between parties to a marriage, wherever defendants/respondents are located outside the jurisdiction of Court, Court..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Wherever such facility is available, it ought to be fully utilized and all the High Courts ought to issue appropriate administrative instructions to regulate the use of video conferencing for certain category of cases - Matrimonial cases where one..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Wherever one or both the parties make a request for use of video conferencing, proceedings may be conducted on video conferencing, obviating the needs of the party to appear in person...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 16-- Examining defendant immediately - Defendant is old woman of 80 years and suffering from paralysis - She is about to leave jurisdiction of Court for her better treatment where her grandson is residing - Application rightly allowed by trial Court by assigning reasons, which cannot be said to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Handwriting expert - Execution and signatures on agreement to sell denied by defendant - It was therefore, for the plaintiff to give evidence in affirmative - Right to lead evidence in rebuttal arises only if defendant had led any evidence in affirmative on the issue - Evidence..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1(3)-- Affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief of a witness not named in the list of witnesses tendered - Evidence of said witness not to be read in evidence, as leave to examine said witness not given - However, liberty is granted to plaintiff to file an appropriate application to seek leave of Court..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Rebuttal evidence - Allowing expert to take photographs of specimen signatures of defendant taken during his cross examination - Order allowing application, upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 16, 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4-- Rent and Eviction - Recording of evidence by Commissioner - Merely because documents have been filed alongwith affidavit same would not ipso-facto be admissible in evidence as same are subject to orders of Court...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 16, 17-- Admissibility of document - Petitioner has raised objections to proof and admissibility of documents - Rent Controller should have proceeded to pass appropriate order on objections raised by counsel for petitioner with regard to mode or proof and admissibility of attached documents alongwith..........

Showing : 71-80 of 611 Results