Showing : 21-30 of 212 Results

SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 3-- Irrelevant or inadmissible documents - O.13.R.3 deals with rejection of irrelevant or inadmissible documents - Court can reject any document which it considers irrelevant or otherwise inadmissible, at any stage of the suit, duly recording the grounds of such rejection...........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 3-- Rejection of irrelevant or inadmissible documents - There is a difference between relevance of a document or its admissibility or inadmissibility - Court may reject a document if it is not relevant to the matter in controversy but so far as admissibility is concerned, an objection against..........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4-- Endorsement on documents - Documents admitted in Court have to be dealt with in two stages, first is when the documents are filed or produced in Court - At that stage documents have to be received by the Court - Secondly, at the time of formal proof of documents - At that stage Court has to..........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4, 6, 7-- Marking of document - Mere marking of a document as an exhibit does not dispense with proof thereof - Admissibility of a document has to be tested at the stage of evidence - Document if inadmissible, cannot form part of record and shall be returned to person producing them after being rejected as..........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 10, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73, 74-- Comparison of disputed with admitted signatures - Summoning of Income Tax Returns - Plea that disputed document does not contain the date, month and year of execution - Income Tax Returns sought to be summoned pertains to the period 2000-2001 - Disputed document also executed on or after 2000 -..........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 10, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 74-- Income tax returns - Income tax returns are public documents within the meaning of S.74 of Evidence Act - There is no embargo for the Court to summon the Income Tax returns of a person...........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 7-- Document not properly stamped - Objection as to admissibility of document - Can be raised at a later stage, though no such objection was raised during trial - Since no stamp duty and penalty were paid, the said document is directed to be de-exhibited from the record...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4-- Exhibition of a document - Mere marking or exhibiting the document does not dispense with the proof of document nor it take away right of opposite party to say such document cannot be relied upon as it is not registered...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4, Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33, 35-- Exhibition of documents - U, registered and unstamped document - Procedure envisaged u/s 33 & 35 of Stamp Act for impounding of those documents can be adopted after exhibiting the same and thereafter decide the question for which purpose the said documents are permitted to be admitted in evidence..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7-- Admissibility of document - Objections to admissibility of document should be raised by party so objecting before endorsement is made and Court is obliged to consider said objection, form its opinion and record same which is followed by and endorsement thereon with regard to document being..........

Showing : 21-30 of 212 Results