Showing : 71-80 of 90 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Witness - Recall - A witness cannot be recalled on the ground that he did not tell the truth when he appeared earlier...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - Further cross-examination - Not specifically mentioned in the application as to in what respect further cross-examination is essential and what are the essential questions which could not be put - Order of recall - Cannot be allowed to be sustained when the application is..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - It is the Court and not the party who can recall a witness and to put any question which the Court thinks necessary - Party cannot recall a witness who has already been cross-examined for further cross-examination...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 2(4), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 6(1)(a)-- Recall of witness - Case fixed for judgment - Held, permissible - Trial Court has sufficient power to permit party who is not placed ex parte by express order, to take any material step and/or to adduce material evidence at any stage of suit proceeding, even at stage when case is fixed for..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Witness - Recall - A party should not suffer merely because the counsel omitted to put certain vital questions...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - Counsel who cross examined the witness withdrew from the case and new counsel found that some material questions were omitted to be asked - Lower Court allowed the recalling of witness in its discretion - Cannot be said that discretion was capricious or arbitrary...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Witness - Recall - Non appearance of petitioner for long time and his defence closed - Proper opportunity given to all the opposite parties who were present to cross-examine witnesses - Rejection of application for recalling witnesses - Not improper...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of witness for further cross examination - Once witness is cross-examined, he cannot be recalled for further cross-examination on the ground that he was not cross-examined effectively...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Witness - Recall - Certain documents already on record left unexhibited due to lapse on the part of advocate - No prejudice is caused to defendant as he is compensated by costs and has opportunity to cross examine the witness - Order of recall by trial Court - Order upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17, 17A-- Recalling plaintiff to prove certain averment in plaint - Court allowing additional evidence permitting plaintiff to examine himself for further evidence - Not legal - Additional evidence already recorded - Not to be read at the time of arguments - Court directed to recall witness and put such..........

Showing : 71-80 of 90 Results