Showing : 71-80 of 278 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Accused not offering satisfying expalanton to incriminating circumstances put to him - May be counted as providing missing link in the chain - Presumption u/ss 113 and S.106 of Evidence Act get attracted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(g), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Gang rape - Bald statement by accused that they were innocent - No explanation as to why prosecutrix deposed against them and involved them in such a heinous crime - Conviction calls for no interference...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15, 35, 54, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Contraband - Specific question about conscious possession not put to accused in his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Held, presumption that accused was in conscious possession cannot be drawn against him...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Examination of accused - Incriminating circumstances - Explanation - Human blood on clothes of accused - Held, it is duty of accused to explain as to how clothes worn by accused contained human blood...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Held, when attention of accused is drawn to the circumstances that inculpated him in crime and he fails to offer appropriate explanation or gives a false answer, the same can be counted as providing a missing link for building chain of circumstances...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Circumstances which are not put to the accused in his examination u/s 313 Cr.P.C. cannot be used against him and must be excluded from consideration...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 22, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 389-- Bail during pendency of appeal - Accused convicted u/ss 8, 22 of NDPS Act and sentenced to 15 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1.50 lacs - Incriminating evidence and circumstance occurred against accused not put to him during his examination u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Accused remained in jail for about 6..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Examination of accused - Object of - Held, statement u/s.313 Cr.P.C. is recorded to meet requirement of principles of natural justice as it requires that an accused may be given an opportunity to furnish explanation of incriminating material which had come against him in trial - In a case of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Statement of accused recorded u/s 313 - Use of - Held, such statement cannot be made basis for conviction of accused - His answers to questions put to him u/s 313 cannot be used to fill up gaps left by prosecution witnesses in their depositions - Thus, statement of accused is not substantive piece..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Examination of accused - Offence u/ss 279, 337 & 304-A - No question was asked from accused regarding post-mortem report or injury report which was exhibited - Formalities of S.313 Cr.P.C were not duly observed - First Appellate Court rightly remanded the matter to trial Court...........

Showing : 71-80 of 278 Results