Showing : 1-10 of 20 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 182(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 494, 109-- Offence u/ss 494, 109 - Jurisdiction - Objection as to jurisdiction - Where main accused does not made any endeavour to question the impugned order of framing charge and dismissal of revision against the same, objection as to jurisdiction on behalf of co-accused is wholly untenable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, 228, 397, 401, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 34, 36, 376(2)(g), 366-- Framing of charge - Revision against - Allegations against revisionists that victim was raped by co-accused in furtherance of common intention of co-accused - Held, there is no illegality or impropriety in impugned order framing charges against revisionists - Petition dismissed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 216-- Framing of additional charge u/s 406 IPC - Informant filed an application for addition of charge u/s 406 IPC, as there were allegations against husband about criminal breach of trust as far as stridhan is concerned - Magistrate allowed the application against husband and mother-i, law after..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Framing of charge - Revision lies against order framing charge - Held, in matters when impugned order can be challenged before Court of revision then in such matters, inherent powers should not be exercised - Petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 239, 240, 397, 401-- Framing of charge - Revision against - Revisional Court can examine the correctness of the order framing charge by reference to the documents referred to in Ss.239 and 240 of Cr.P.C - Charge cannot be quashed on the basis of documents which accused may produce except in exceptional cases where..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227-- Discharge - Even grave suspicion is enough to proceed against accused - In the instant case, from statement of complainant and his witnesses, prima facie case made out against accused - Held, framing of charge not illegal - Revision dismissed...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227-- Application for discharge dismissed - Revision against - Sufficient material on record to suggest that soon before her death deceased was continuously harassed by accused on account of dowry demand - Trial Court after recording prima facie satisfaction observed that there are sufficient grounds..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397,401, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19(3)(c)-- Case registered against petitioner, a public servant, under Corruption Act of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income - Investigating agency submitted charge sheet after completion of investigation - Revision filed against order framing charge - Held, order framing..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397-- Charge - Revision against framing charge u/s 420 IPC - Accused bargaining of gold pertaining to some pieces of yellow alloy stating it to be gold - Ingredients of cheating well available in the case - At this stage it cannot be stated that no offence is committed by the accused on the face value..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d), 19, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397-- Bar of revision - Charge framed against accused for the offence u/ss 120-B, 420, 468, 471 of IPC and also under Corruption Act - Revision against order framing charge - Held, order framing charge is not an interlocutory order - Hence revision is maintainable...........

Showing : 1-10 of 20 Results