LawMirror.com

Results of criminal procedure code appeal

Showing : 421-430 of 1221 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, right of `victim' to prefer an appeal in terms of said proviso to S.372 is an unqualified right and no `leave to appeal' or `special leave' is required to be obtained by him/her for purpose, as required by State or..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), S.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, no limitation of time has been provided by Legislature for exercise of such right of appeal by `victim' in terms of said proviso - Hence, in the fact and circumstances of each case, Court has to determine as to..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, proviso to S.372 Cr.P.C. came into operation w.e.f. December 31, 2009 - Hence, in absence of any legislative intent to contrary, in all cases, in which a judgment and order has been passed by a criminal Court on and after that date,..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, if subject of crime is dead or incapacitated to extent or suffers from such a disability that he/she cannot take steps to exercise his/her right under proviso to S.372, any of his/her next of kin, who can establish..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, if any person prefers an appeal in terms of proviso to S.372, solely on the basis of his status as `guardian' or `legal heir', he/she will have to establish legal basis of his/her such status in reference to law, as..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, once an appeal preferred in terms of proviso to S.372 against an order is entertained by an appellate Court on merits, to whatever result, no fresh/second appeal by any party/person can/should be entertained against same order...........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, no distinction can be made between a case instituted by complainant/informant with police and by complainant before Court directly - An absolute right of victim (complainant or not) to file an appeal u/proviso to S.372 does not get..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 195, 340 -- Prosecution for perjury - Validity - Held, prosecution for perjury is required only where perjury appears to be deliberate and conscious and conviction is reasonable, probable or likely - In present case, complaint filed after about 4 years on basis of mere impression that deposition on affidavit by respondent is false -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(3), 397, 401 -- Appeal against acquittal - Once an appeal against acquittal stood dismissed by Hon'ble Division Bench, revision against acquittal cannot be entertained...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372 -- Appeal against acquittal by victim - Delay of 725 days - Condonation - Since there is no procedure to inform victim after acquittal or conviction in the case, victim may get information as regards fate of case, after a long lapse of time - Long lapse of time may occur in filing appeal by victim in the absence of appeal by State..........

Showing : 421-430 of 1221 Results