Showing : 41-50 of 51 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Dishonour of Cheque - Additional evidence at appellate stage - Accused in appeal wanted to get his alleged signatures on the Cheque compared with his specimen signatures, though he had sufficient opportunity for the same during trial - Accused himself admitted that he issued Cheque, but alleging..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Additional evidence by appellate Court - If the appellate Court thinks that it is necessary in the interest to justice to take additional evidence, it shall do so - It is not restricted to case where there is some formal defect - The matter is one of the discretion of the appellate Court...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Dishonour of cheque - Additional evidence at appellate stage - Fact sought to be proved by way of additional evidence admitted in reply to the application - Instead of allowing the application its effect be examined by Court during course of arguments...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Dishonour of cheque - Application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. to during pendency of appeal against conviction for recall of witness to prove that complainant firm is not registered under Punjab Money Lenders Act or with the Reserve Bank of India and as such is not competent to lend money in cash - Fact that..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Additional evidence - Appellate stage - Additional evidence can be taken at appellate stage - Application cannot be rejected on the ground that in case of acceptance of application the trial will start at its initial stage...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Dishonour of cheque - Repayment alleged - Receipt produced in defence evidence - In rebuttal complainant filed an affidavit that he never issued such receipt and it does not bear his signature and it is forged - Complainant once again cross examined and he once again denied his signature on the..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 391, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Bribe - Additional evidence - Recording of - Accused alleged to have accepted bribe - Defence witnesses did not turn up as they were not served - Evidence closed by defence - Plea of alibi raised by accused - Plea not inquired by IO - Fit case for appellate court to issue directions for recording..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391, 309(1)-- Additional evidence at appellate stage - When despite grant of time for defence evidence, the accused fails to avail of the opportunity of leading defence evidence, he cannot complain that he was not given reasonable or proper opportunity - Proper and reasonable opportunity means an opportunity..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391, 386-- Retrial and reinvestigation - Communal frenzy - Death of 14 persons - Reinvestigation and retrial ordered as there was dishonest and fault investigation and trial was held in perfunctory manner as large number of PWs turned hostile and resiled; star witnesses threatened; Prosecuting agency not..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 386, 391-- Appellate Court - Remand of case to trial Court - Appellant Bank Manager charged for offence of cheating by falsification of accounts - In Auditors report submitted in 1984 and 1985 alleged lapses not pointed out but in 1986 Auditors' report lapses pointed out on basis of which complaint lodged..........

Showing : 41-50 of 51 Results