Showing : 1-10 of 11 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal trial-- Religion of accused - Not to be mentioned in enquiry, investigation or trial which is against the spirit of Constitution of India - Investigating Officers in the State of Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh directed not to mention religion of accused or victim...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Punjab Civil and Criminal Courts, Preparation and Supply of Copies of Records Rules, 1965, Rule 3-- Supply of certified and uncertified copies of documents by Juvenile Justice Board - Petitioner facing trial in Court of Sessions and co-accused, a juvenile, facing trial in Juvenile Justice Board - Offence pertaining to same FIR - Certain documents marked exhibit in JJ Board - Supply of copies of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(c), Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(c)-- Parole - Elections - Parole for canvassing - Person who is facing trial in criminal cases and is in jail, has no right to be released on parole or bail for canvassing...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 20-- Appointment of Lambardar - Criminal case - Pendency of - Respondent is involved in a criminal case - Charges have been framed by a court of law - Respondent would be required to stand trial - Held, respondent is eligible to compete for post of Lambardar, however, would not be suitable - This is..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1909-- Appointment of Lambardar - Petitioner, a matriculate, and aged 35 years appointed Lambardar in preference to respondent against whom Criminal proceedings were pending - A private complaint also pending against petitioner - Order of Collector set aside in appeal by Commissioner and in revision by..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules 1908, Rule 16(ii)(a)-- Dismissal of headman who was involved in a criminal case u/s 302/34 IPC and was taken in custody and his trial terminated in his conviction - Held, case squarely fall within the domain of Rule 16 (2) (a) - Such a person who is involved in serious crime indictable u/s 302 of IPC cannot command..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 7-- Punjab Light Diesel Oil and Kerosene Dealers Licensing Order, 1978, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.193 - Recovery of four thousand liters of black oil and two thousand liters of spurious light diesel oil from tanker of which accused were driver and conductor - Challan against accused presented..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4, Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 3, 7, Punjab Food Grains Dealers Licensing and Price Control Order, 1978-- Possession of maize in excess of permissible limits, proved - Violation of Control Order 1978 - Accused convicted - Accused faced trial for 14 years and during interregum he did not indulge in any criminal activity and accused not a previous convict - Accused ordered to be released on bail...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401-- Punjab Excise Act, 1914, Section 61(1)(a) - Revision - Production of case property - During the course of trial when the evidence was recorded, the prosecution did not produce the lahan that was recovered - Held that it may not be mandatory in all cases to produce the case property. If prejudice..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Complaint under Forests Act - Defence offered is that the area was covered by notification of 10.11.1980 under Punjab Land Preservation Act - This is a question in dispute and basically one of fact - This can only be looked into by the trial Court - High Court would only exercise its inherent..........

Showing : 1-10 of 11 Results