Showing : 21-30 of 36 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 2-- Examination of witnesses - Denial of - Validity - Prayer for tendering affidavits of witnesses declined - Trial Court granted last opportunity to examine remaining evidence - Defendant No.2 literally tried to exhaust plaintiff by cross-examining her attorney PW1 in parts and on a number of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination of co-defendant - Not permissible when there is common plea in written statement - Common plea when result of impersonation or that it was the result of fraud or deception, then Court can allow cross examination of a defendant by co-defendant...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination of a defendant by co-defendant - No conflict of interest between the two defendants - No right to cross examine co-defendant - In case an adverse statement is made by one defendant against another defendant in examination-in-chief then other defendant has right to cross examine..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination - By co-defendant - Witness produced by defendant who is supporting case of plaintiff - Held, other defendants have right to cross examine the witness...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17-- Admission - Rebuttal in cross-examination - Effect of - Held, admission is the best evidence but when admitted fact itself later on has been denied by defendant in his cross examination, then it was the duty of plaintiff to prove his own case...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4(2)-- Commission appointed to record cross examination of parties - Commission appointed by High Court at Bombay - Defendant No.1 residing at Nagpur - Defendant has to appear before Commission at his cost for cross examination...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Suit for specific performance-- Question as to whether Court can direct a plaintiff in a suit for specific performance (or any other suit) to file an undertaking that in the event of not succeeding in the suit, he shall pay Rs.25 lakhs (or any other sum) by way of damages to the defendant - Held, No - The reasons being (i) Every..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Suit for specific performance-- Question as to whether Court can direct a plaintiff in a suit for specific performance (or any other suit) to file an undertaking that in the event of not succeeding in the suit, he shall pay Rs.25 lakhs (or any other sum) by way of damages to the defendant - Held, No - The reasons being (i) Every..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 4, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 137-- Summoning of a plaintiff's witness at the instance of defendant for cross examination who was not examined by plaintiff suspecting his bona fides but whose affidavit in lieu of examination in chief was filed - Where the name of an individual figures in the list of witnesses, the party has a..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118-- Presumption - Rebuttal - Defendants must prove the non-existence of consideration so probable that a reasonable man would subscribe to that view - Proof need not be restricted to evidence adduced by defendant - Information elicited from the cross-examination of plaintiff's witnesses can also be..........

Showing : 21-30 of 36 Results