LawMirror.com

Results of cross examination in civil procedure code

Showing : 21-30 of 226 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 19, Rule 2 -- Affidavit - Cross-examination of deponent - Not necessary as petitioners right to object affidavit is secure and he can make his own affidavit...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Recall of a witness - Rectification of inadvertent mistake of mentioning wrong survey number - Plaintiff in his cross-examination confronted thrice about correct survey number from which cause in the suit had arisen - No inadvertent mistake or clerical mistake reflected from said testimony - Attempt on the part of plaintiff..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 12 -- Production of documents - Eviction petition - Tenant seeking production of documents to prove that landlord has an alternative shop now available to him to overcome his bona fide need for running business of his son - However, neither tenant nor Court can direct landlord to choose place and premises for running his business..........

TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Subsequent events - Said events occurred after filing of suit and already on record in chief examination of PW1, who already cross-examined by defendants - It cannot be said that these subsequent events cannot be brought on record by way of amendment, particularly, when no prejudice is caused to..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 19, Rule 2, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Reply to application U.O.39.Rr.1,2 supported by an affidavit - Cross examination of deponent/defendant - Specific grounds as to why such cross examination is necessary has to be stated - Application full of generalities without any specifics and..........

TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1A -- Summoning of witness or production of documents - Leave of Court is permissible only if document satisfies the requirement of foundation in pleadings and document is referred to in list of documents in plaint or written statement, but copy or original of such document is not filed along with plaint or written statement for..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 13, Rule 1, 3, 4, 6 -- Production and exhibition of documents - Objection by plaintiff - Mere exhibition of document is only for purpose of identification of document and does not dispense with its formal proof, unless same is formally proved - Moreover, plaintiff has an occasion to raise objection qua admissibility and mode..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3 -- Closure of plaintiffs evidence - Six effective opportunities for concluding evidence were availed by plaintiff but evidence not concluded - Case was adjourned for evidence of defendant - However, taking into account that plaintiff is to be cross-examined and is to lead evidence through one more witness only, therefore, in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Recall of a witness for further cross examination - A witness cannot be recalled for further cross examination for elaboration on the points left out in the cross examination, when points on which witness is to be further cross examined are not mentioned...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 1(3)(a), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14 -- Production of documents by defendant to confront plaintiff during plaintiff's cross-examination - Not permissible - Defendants had to follow mandate as contained in O.8.R.1 CPC, which it had to otherwise rely upon in a list of..........

Showing : 21-30 of 226 Results