Showing : 21-30 of 35 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Accused kidnapped prosecutrix, sister-in-law of complainant by giving her false assurance - Prosecutrix below 16 years of age on the date of alleged occurrence not established - Evidence showing that prosecutrix willfully accompanied accused from one place to another -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 452, 506-- Rape - Medical report that prosecutrix is habitual to sexual intercourse - Prosecutrix and her sister-in-law sleeping in room with doors bolted and bolts were intact - No evidence as to how accused came into the room and committed rape - Unreliable that accused committed rape and sister-in-law..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Girl aged about 15 years - Prosecutrix consenting party - Age of prosecutrix taken from school register which is based on information given by parents - Father of prosecutrix deposed that age of prosecutrix was 14-15 years - Defence in cross examination of father of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Cross examination - Fact of threatening with dagger coming in cross examination - However, this aspect neither stated in statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. nor in FIR - Held, this contradiction does not make evidence of prosecutrix unreliable...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 511-- Rape - Attempt to rape - Proof - Prosecutrix in her evidence specifically stated that accused penetrated his penis partly in her private parts but during cross-examination she categorically deposed that "I did not sustain any bleeding injury on my private parts - I also did not sustain any..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Gang tape - Three accused - Two of the accused brothers-in-law of prosecutrix i.e. sisters husband - Medical evidence supported rape - Cross examination at length but nothing could be brought out to discard sworn statement of prosecutrix - Accused arrested from place of occurrence - Conviction..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape - Contradictions in testimony of prosecutrix - In her earlier statement prosecutrix stated that it was co-accused A who first committed the rape on her - In cross examination she stated that it was accused B who had first committed the rape - Prosecutrix stated that she was four months..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape - Prosecutrix told her mother that accused raped her whole night but in cross examination she stated that accused committed bad act by inserting his penis twice and she became unconscious throughout night - Medical evidence that hymen of prosecutrix was ruptured, but rupture was old and that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape - Girl aged 5-6 years - Statement of prosecutrix and medical evidence amply showing that rape was committed - Prosecutrix an intelligent child and she gave statement without any influence of her parents - Nothing in cross examination that she is not speaking truth - Prosecutrix identified..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape - Identification parade - Rape case - Magistrate who conducted identification parade in Jail not examined as a witness - However, memo prepared regarding identification of accused persons in presence of Magistrate placed on record and that not challenged in cross examination - Prosecutrix in..........

Showing : 21-30 of 35 Results