Showing : 251-260 of 1100 Results

HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 19, Rule 2, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Affidavit - Cross-examination of deponent - Permissible only in case of affidavit filed by third parties and not to affidavits filed by parties to proceedings as affidavit filed in support of petition is not treated, as an affidavit filed by way of evidence...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 368, 344, 392, 120B-- Kidnapping for ransom - Wrongful restraint - Criminal conspiracy - Accused `D' has not been identified by victim in Court on more than one occasion - Victim in his cross-examination after seeing accused `D' only stated that "Aisa sa hi tha" - It is not the case of victim that his eyes were closed..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-- Correction of error in affidavit - U, signed affidavit - Court is duly vested with powers u/s 151 CPC to correct any error and if there is any mistake on the part of witness by not putting the signature on the affidavit, Court can certainly ask such person to do the needful - Moreover, objection..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 11-- Murder - Plea of alibi - Prosecution proved its case from the circumstantial evidence on record and conduct of accused showing his motive to commit the murder of deceased - Post mortem report of deceased duly exhibited and proved even in the absence of Doctor having appeared in witness box - Plea..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recalling of witnesses for further cross-examination - Court below allowed the cross-examination of informant on the question of point on which Court would agree, as petitioner gave a set of questionnaire of 14 questions and assured the Court that his cross-examination is confined on those 14..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination - One is required to put one's own version in cross-examination of opponent - Effect of non cross-examination is that the statement of witness has not been disputed...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross-examination - Legally inadmissible evidence is not rendered admissible merely because no cross-examination thereon has taken place...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ia)-- Divorce - Cruelty by husband - Wife represented through power of attorney holder - Allegations were based on personal knowledge of wife - Information never transferred to attorney - Testimony of attorney could not stand to the test of cross-examination - Attorney was totally ignorant in material..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - No document to show any loan transaction - Complainant also not proved his capacity to give such a big loan - Even if complainant had collected the money from his grandmother and relatives, then why he has given such a huge amount to accused without obtaining any security..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4)-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Admittedly, complainant has no friendly relationship with accused, hence, there is doubt that why complainant will give such a huge amount without getting executed any security document - Even, there is nothing on record to show any particulars of loan -..........

Showing : 251-260 of 1100 Results