Showing : 251-260 of 1014 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18-- Recovery of 995 gms opium - Time of recovery - As per statement of PW3, accused apprehended at about 6.15 pm at spot and DSP arrived at spot at 7.00 pm and after completing formalities of search, ruqa was sent to police station at 8.00 pm - But, said version contradicted by PW4, in his..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18, 57-- Recovery of 995 gms opium - Non-compliance of S.57 of the Act - PW3 categorically stated in cross-examination that he has not made any report u/s 57 of the Act - Even, he deposed that he does not know whether any official of their department made any report u/s 57 of the Act - There is total,..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Relation witnesses - Relation by itself does not discredit the testimony of said witnesses if their testimony remains unshaken in elaborate cross-examination...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 2-- Eviction petition - Personal necessity - Husband deposing on behalf of wife - Cross examination conducted by tenant sufficient to prove bonafide need of landlady - Held, merely because landlady has opted to produce her husband to establish her bonafide need is not sufficient enough to reject the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i), 13(3)(a)(ii), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 5-- Eviction petition - Bonafide necessity - Pleading - Landlady pleaded necessary ingredients of personal necessity - Tenant not raised any objection to the same and vaguely denied the same not specifically mentioning that landlady or her husband were in occupation of any other specific shop - Cross..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 7.500 kg charas - Delay of 11 days in sending samples to FSL - No cross-examination of I.O which would enable him to explain the reason as to why samples were sent after such a delay - Moreover, samples along with seal were received in FSL in an intact condition and tested positive for..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination - Tendering of a witness for cross-examination without there being any examination-in-chief not permissible - As it amounts to giving up of witness - Recourse to such practice is inconsistent with S.138 of Act. (1995(3) SCC 367)...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3A-- Party as its own witness - Provision of O.18.R.3-A CPC is directory in nature - Court can examine party at later stage though permission as envisaged U.O.18.R.3-A CPC is not taken - In the instant case initially, defendant permitted his attorney to appear on his behalf as he was not in India -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138, 146, 148-- Cross examination - Need not be confined to the facts to which the witness testifies on his examination-in-chief - Questions can be put in cross-examination in order to nullify or establish the veracity or otherwise of allegations made in the proceedings...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138, 146, 148-- Cross examination - Refusal to allow questions at the time of cross examination can only be justified if Court comes to conclusion that questions are : (i) inter-alia those which a party can not be forced to answer; (ii) patently erroneous; (iii) put to delay the proceedings; (iv) for oblique..........

Showing : 251-260 of 1014 Results