Showing : 211-220 of 999 Results

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Where accused abjured his guilt and desired to face trial, propriety of order of conviction could not be questioned on the basis of statement made by accused while recording statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C., in absence of appropriate cross-examination of PWs...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(c), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 154-- Quantum of seized article - Hostile witness - PW3 was declared hostile by prosecution but his evidence in connection with preparation of labels in presence of PW14 corroborated by PWs could not be washed off on record - Said evidence unimpeachably speaking of quantity of ganja - No..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50(1)-- Recovery of 25 kg 450 gms ganja - Search - Non-compliance of mandate of S.50(1) of the Act - Accused convicted upon seizure of ganja from his two bags which was recovered from roof-top of bus, not on the basis of recovery of any illicit article from the body of accused - Even seized money and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Eviction petition - Amendment sought to incorporate the fact that tenant does not deny the relationship of landlord and tenant which she earlier denied in her written statement - Landlord has no objection to the said amendment, but only that this is to delay the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 17(1), 2(s)-- Share household - A residence belonging to mother-i, law or father-i, law would not be a `shared household' within the meaning of S.2(s) of Act and a daughter-i, law has no right of residence therein in terms of S.17(1) of the Act - No question of PWDV Act being used at cross purposes with the..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 112, 114, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 417-- DNA test - Rape case - Allegation that accused cohabited with prosecutrix on the false promise of marriage as a result she become pregnant and gave birth to a child - However, during cross-examination defence put a suggestion that accused has not fathered the child born to prosecutrix - In view of..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 137, 138-- Cross-examination/re-examination - Cannot be held by a party, who is not adverse to person, who has examined any such witness, as it is a right of adverse party...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 325, 452-- Offence u/ss 323, 325, 452 IPC - Cross case - Accused allegedly gave several blows of lathis and dandas to PW2 - However, PW2 received only three injuries in the incident - Doctor opined that two injuries sustained by PW2 were abrasions and third was complaint of pain - If all the accused had..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Will-- Suspicious circumstance - Contention that Will in question is influenced by applicant, is untenable as applicant was not living with testatrix nor she got the Will prepared and was even not present at the time of making of Will - It cannot be said that applicant played prominent role in the..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of a witness for cross-examination - Counsel for accused could not cross-examine compliant despite opportunity granted for several dates - No explanation for the same - Even when right to cross-examination was closed and case was fixed for recording statement of accused u/s 311 Cr.P.C.,..........

Showing : 211-220 of 999 Results