Showing : 211-220 of 1012 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, 22-- Appeal - Non consideration of cross objections while deciding appeal - First Appellate Court manifestly erred in not considering cross objections - It is a serious error, which may cause serious prejudice to legal rights of defendants - Impugned judgment set aside - Matter remitted for decision..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Building and rebuilding - Tenant contended that since landlord has not sufficient funds for reconstruction thus he cannot be evicted - Contention rejected, as petition cannot be allowed only on that point, since tenant did not cross-examine landlord when he appeared in witness box on..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 34-- Murder of 9 years old girl - Circumstantial evidence - Appeal against conviction - Accused acquitted as there is sufficient indication to doubt the prosecution story viz. : (i) dead body of deceased has not been physically identified as it was found in mutilated and decomposed state, but..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Muslim Law-- Talaq - Pronouncement of triple talaq in Court during cross-examination, does not appear to be valid mode of divorce...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Muslim Law-- Talaq - Pronouncement of triple talaq in Court during cross-examination, does not appear to be valid mode of divorce...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9-- Order refusing to appoint local commissioner - Revision - Report of demarcation available on file and demarcation was done by Halqa Kanungo - Petitioner has options either to accept the demarcation or file objections to the report of local commissioner or to summon said Halqa Kanungo as a witness..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Additional accused - Once a person is impleaded as an accused invoking S.319 Cr.P.C., Court must not only recall witnesses already examined but Court must also ensure that witnesses are examined-i, chief before offering witnesses for cross-examination by newly added accused - However, it is not..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 299-- Recording of evidence in absence of accused - Offence u/ss 341, 323, 34 IPC - Conditions as prescribed u/s 299(1) Cr.P.C. is not attracted in the case to record the deposition of PWs - Examination-in-chief of PWs recorded by Court below in the absence of petitioner cannot be given in evidence..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Adverse possession-- Claim of defendant that he was in possession of suit property for the last 35 years, not proved, as there is no document on record to prove the same - Plaintiff on the other hand stated that property fell to his share - Defendant did not make any cross-examination of plaintiff on this aspect -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21(C), 8(C)-- Recovery of 5.017 Kg heroin - Testimony of official witnesses was consistent, credible and reliable - Nothing material could be elicited to discredit the testimony of official witnesses despite lengthy cross-examination - Minor discrepancy which does not go to the root of matter, does not cast any..........

Showing : 211-220 of 1012 Results