LawMirror.com

Results of cross not

Showing : 211-220 of 1838 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Cross-examination of complainant - Complainant was harassed as he appeared on various dates but no cross-examination was carried - Accused misused magnanimity of Court by delaying proceedings - However, accused is granted one opportunity to cross-examine complainant subject to cost of Rs.5000/- - Application allowed...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Application u/s 311 Cr.P.C - Notice kept in envelop permitted to be exhibited by Trial Court while allowing application - Notice was part of envelop and could not be exhibited due to inadvertence - Assigning exhibit to notice at subsequent stage does not amount to filling lacuna but correcting an error - However, to balance the..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Local investigation report - Challenge as to - Commissioner's report on ground that he did not superimpose case map and settlement map - Suit for declaration - Commissioner took paddy plot and private plots as fixed points with the help of both parties - Petitioner neither objected to mode of survey though..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 138 -- Cross-examination - Divorce petition - Plea that document was wrongly read in evidence - It is always open to a litigant to, in cross examination, confront the witness of opposite party with documents and which documents, if admitted by witnesses, are entitled to be read in evidence - In present case, wife had an opportunity to..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227 -- Discharge - Charge already framed and explained to accused - 125 PWs are already examined by prosecution and they are cross-examined by accused - There is no question of discharge of accused - Application for discharge rightly dismissed...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Expert opinion - In absence of expert appearing in witnesses and being subjected to cross-examination his report alone cannot be treated as evidence much less an opinion evidence...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Cross-examination - When facts spoken in chief examination was not denied specifically in cross-examination, facts so not denied have deemed to be admitted...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Assault - Medical corroboration not necessary in all cases - Corroboration is required only to confirm the version of witnesses and if their version is credible and reliable and if they are found to be adhering to the cross-examiantion, medical corroboration may not be necessary...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161 -- Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C - Statement cannot be used for any purpose other than one permissible u/s 162 Proviso Cr.P.C - Such statement can be used to contradict witness in the manner provided u/s 145 of Evidence Act and also for the purpose of re-examination, if statement was used for contradiction, but only for the purpose of..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 1 -- Permission to serve interrogatories - Serving of interrogatories cannot be denied on the ground that questions can be put to witness at the time of cross examination...........

Showing : 211-220 of 1838 Results