Showing : 1-10 of 65 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 325, 452, 427, 354, 201, 341, 34, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x), (xi), (s)-- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 325, 452, 427, 354, 201, 341, 34 IPC and S.3(1)(x), (xi), (s) of SC/ST Act - No allegations regarding uttering derogatory remarks made by complainant at initial stage when she dialed at No.100 - Petitioners are in custody since March 2019 and even arguments on charge have..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 452, 326, 232, 324, 427, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 54, 59-- Quashing of proceedings - Compromise - Offence u/ss 452, 326, 232, 324, 427, 34 IPC and Ss.25, 54, 59 of Arms Act - Dispute between parties amicably settled inter se - Compromise is genuine - FIR along with consequent proceedings held, quashed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 365, 452, 376D, 394-- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 365, 452, 376-D, 394 - Neither there is specific allegation against petitioner nor his name finds mention in FIR - Even, statement of complainant u/ss 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. is self contradictory - Moreover, co-accused has already been granted bail - Fit case to grant bail as..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 452, 427, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 320, 482-- Offence u/s 307, 452, 427 IPC and S.27 Arms Act - Compromise - No injury resulted from the shots which were allegedly fired from licensed pistol - Thus, continuation of criminal proceedings between parties would be abuse of process of law - FIR quashed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452-- Release of seized property - A claim of title to goods which have seen seized is a relevant consideration while passing an order u/s 452 Cr.P.C...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452-- Release of seized property - Where a claim is made before Court that property does not belong to person from whom it was seized, S.452 Cr.P.C does not mandate that its custody should be handed over to person from whose possession it was seized, overriding the claim of genuine title which is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452-- Release of seized property - Function which Court exercises u/s 452 Cr.P.C is of a judicial nature - In making that order, Court must undoubtedly have due regard to entitlement claimed by person who seeks possession of property...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452-- Release of seized property - Claim made by respondent to title of goods is seriously in dispute - Such a claim be agitated before competent civil forum - In the absence of such an adjudication, custody of seized goods, should continue to be with appellant, as goods were made over to him 26 years..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2)-- Default bail - Offence u/ss 302, 341, 323, 452, 336, 143, 149 IPC - As on completion of 90 days of prescribed period u/s 167 Cr.P.C there were no papers of investigation or charge sheet u/s 173 Cr.P.C before concerned Magistrate - Accused was thus denied of protection established by law - Issue of..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 143, 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 506(1), 34-- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 506(1) IPC - Accused and de facto complainant are relatives - No case of prosecution that accused caused injury or that he intended to cause injury on any vital part of body of de facto complainant - No case that accused has got any..........

Showing : 1-10 of 65 Results