LawMirror.com

Results of criminal procedure code evidence

Showing : 1931-1940 of 2701 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 223, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 504 -- Joint trial - Offence u/s 302 IPC and another offence u/ss 307, 504 IPC - Incident took place in the same village on the same day - Time and place of occurrence of both incidents different - Prosecution witnesses also different - Held, that since the eye witnesses to be examined..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 182, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Kalendra u/s 182 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of - Petitioner lodged FIR for offence under IPC - Police filed cancellation report - Magistrate accepted the same - Petitioner given liberty to file protest complaint - Petitioner filed complaint and after recording of preliminary evidence respondents 2..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 -- Quashing of summoning order - Summoning order on the bald statement of complainant - No documentary evidence against accused - Evidence on record does not even suggest that prima facie case is made out against the accused or that he was even remotely related with the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197 -- Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Offence under Indian Penal Code and Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Offences under Indian Penal Code not required any sanction - Trial to continue - After parties lead their evidence, trial Court to decide whether or not any offences are made out under Drugs Act and whether such offences..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 -- Appeal against acquittal - If two views are reasonably possible from the evidence on record, one favouring the accused and one against the accused, High Court is not expected to reverse the acquittal merely because it would have taken the view against the accused had it tried the case...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 475, 173, 190, Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1978, Rule 3(a) -- Trial by Court Martial - Juncture of delivery of accused - Held, expression "charged" occurring in both S.475, Cr.P.C. as well as in R.3 of the Rules can only mean a stage after filing of a "Police Report" u/s 173(2) or after filing..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307 -- Attempt to murder - Appeal against acquittal - Accused persons stated that in course of the occurrence they were attacked by PWs.2 and 6 and also they set their pet dog to cause injuries on their person and, therefore, they reported the matter in Police Station and thereafter were examined..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24 -- Confession - Retracted - Unless a retracted confession is corroborated in material particulars, it is not prudent to base conviction in a criminal case on its strength alone...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24 -- Confession and retracted confession - Confessions can be acted upon, if Court is satisfied that they were voluntarily made and they were true - In a retracted confession Court may take into account the retracted confession, but it must look for the reasons for the making of the confession as well..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 -- Appeal against acquittal - Reassessing of evidence - Power of High Court - Held, in appeal against acquittal though powers of High Court to reassess evidence and to reach its own conclusion are as extensive as in an appeal against an order of conviction, yet as a rule of prudence, it should always give proper weight and..........

Showing : 1931-1940 of 2701 Results