Showing : 111-119 of 119 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 498A, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 222(2)-- Charge u/s 304-B and 306 IPC - Accused, however, found guilty of offence u/s 498-A IPC - Court can convict accused u/s 498-A even if no specific charge is framed...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Offence u/ss 498-A, 306 & 114 IPC against father-in-law and mother-in-law of deceased - Allegations of constant harassment and torture in FIR lodged by father of deceased when deceased was not able to conceive - Delay of two days in lodging FIR and husband being excluded is not a ground for bail -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 173, 301, 302-- Report of police u/s 173 Cr.P.C. - Magistrate taking cognizance u/s 354 IPC - Successor Magistrate added a charge u/s 306 IPC on basis of record and fresh application of aggrieved party - No illegality - It does not amount to review of order...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 306, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167-- Offence u/s 306 IPC - Charge sheet not filed within sixty days from the date of arrest - Accused is entitled to bail...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 306, 307-- Pardon to accomplice - Delay in recording approver's statement - By itself not a ground to reject testimony of accomplice - No time limit for recording statement of accomplice...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 306, 307-- Pardon to accomplice - By trial Court - Distinction between Ss.306 and 307 - Plea that statement of accomplice is required to be recorded first in Court of Magistrate and subsequently in trial Court - Not tenable - Section 306 is applicable where order of commitment has not been passed - Section..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 306(4)-- Examination of approver - Held, a person who is granted pardon need not be examined in presence of accused - Accused has no right to appear and cross-examine him at that stage...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 306(4)(a), 465(2)-- Approver - Examination of - Validity - Contention raised for first time at stage of final arguments that procedure prescribed u/s.306(4)(a) Cr.P.C. was not complied with and, therefore, trial was vitiated - Accused failed to raise plea before or after committal of case to Sessions Court that they..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 306(4)(a), 307-- Approver - Accused granted pardon after case committed to Court of Sessions - It is not necessary to comply with sub-section (4)(a) of S.306 of the Code - Non examination of approver as a witness after grant of pardon does not vitiates entire proceeding...........

Showing : 111-119 of 119 Results