LawMirror.com

Results of criminal procedure code 452

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 133 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 452, 326, 232, 324, 427, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 54, 59 -- Quashing of proceedings - Compromise - Offence u/ss 452, 326, 232, 324, 427, 34 IPC and Ss.25, 54, 59 of Arms Act - Dispute between parties amicably settled inter se - Compromise is genuine - FIR along with consequent proceedings..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 148, 149, 323, 328, 452, 506 -- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 148, 149, 323, 328, 452, 506 IPC - FIR does not specifically show that it is petitioner, who had caused grievous injury, although he is specifically named in FIR - Fit case for grant of anticipatory bail - Bail granted...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 435, 436, 452, 427, 379, 149, 506, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Summoning of additional accused - Dismissal of application - As per complainant, village mob was approaching his house and set fire to house, vehicle, etc. - Application u/s.319 Cr.P.C. filed for summoning persons as additional accused whose name was..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 452, 324, 325, 148, 149, 506, 427 -- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 452, 324, 325, 148, 149, 506, 427 IPC - Petitioner is attributed a `simple injury' only and it is not a case that a large number of injuries have been caused to complainant - Bail granted...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 365, 452, 376D, 394 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 365, 452, 376-D, 394 - Neither there is specific allegation against petitioner nor his name finds mention in FIR - Even, statement of complainant u/ss 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. is self contradictory - Moreover, co-accused has already been granted bail..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 452, 427, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 320, 482 -- Offence u/s 307, 452, 427 IPC and S.27 Arms Act - Compromise - No injury resulted from the shots which were allegedly fired from licensed pistol - Thus, continuation of criminal proceedings between parties would be abuse of process of law - FIR quashed...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 452, 120B, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 302, 307, 452, 120B IPC and S.25 Arms Act - Petitioner has been falsely implicated and only allegation against him is that he was keeping vigil outside but there is no evidence of it and this conclusion has also been drawn from..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 354A, 452, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4 -- Bail - Rape case - Prosecutrix has taken u-turn before Court below during trial and not supported prosecution case - Even, all material PWs turned hostile - There is no reason to keep petitioner behind bars for an..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452 -- Release of seized property - A claim of title to goods which have seen seized is a relevant consideration while passing an order u/s 452 Cr.P.C...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 452 -- Release of seized property - Where a claim is made before Court that property does not belong to person from whom it was seized, S.452 Cr.P.C does not mandate that its custody should be handed over to person from whose possession it was seized, overriding the claim of genuine title which is asserted on behalf of a third party...........

Showing : 41-50 of 133 Results