Showing : 1011-1020 of 2295 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 203, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 427, 506, 323-- Dismissal of complaint - Validity - Court below has not discussed evidence to show that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against accused person - Statement of complainant u/s 200 Cr.P.C. and statement of witnesses u/s.202 Cr.P.C. are unrebutted - There is no cross examination by Court..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304A-- Death due to medical negligence - Prosecution of Doctor - Quashing of - Quashing of prosecution sought on the ground that there are two different opinions from two sets of Doctors - Held, High Court u/s.482 Cr.P.C. cannot make a roving enquiry so as to give a finding as to which among two opinions..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 162(1), Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4, 79A, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45A-- IO recording statement of witness by audio video means - Fulfills the requirement of S.162(1) proviso Cr.P.C. - Person who video graphed the examination by IO denied to have done such video graphing - Genuineness and authenticity of CD's and cassettes and the information recorded therein in doubt..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 162(1), Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145-- Statement of witness recorded by I.O. by audio video means - May be treated to be a statement which has been reduced into writing, fulfilling the requirement of S.162(2) Proviso Cr.P.C. - Before a witness can be contradicted with reference to his previous statement made before the IO u/s 162..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 9, 19(4)- - Maintenance - Grant of - Non-compliance of mandatory provision of Cr.P.C. as also of the Act - Held, impugned order granting maintenance set aside - Matter remitted to Family Court for re-hearing and re-deciding the same afresh on basis of materials/evidence produced by parties...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125(1)(a)(b), Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 19(4)-- Maintenance - Entitlement - Wife employed as teacher and drawing fixed salary - No pleading that minor child is in a position to maintain himself but admittedly he was not a party in the case filed by opposite party - Family Court was pleased to allow claim of maintenance in favour of minor child..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 482-- Examination of prosecution witnesses afresh - Sought on the ground that evidence formerly given by witnesses was procured under pressure as brother of complainant was murdered and nephew of complainant was kidnapped - Application allowed - No interference...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 54, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25, 26, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Section 39, 40-- Charges of supporting terrorist organization - Confession made in FIR - Admissibility - Held, FIR is not a substantive piece of evidence - Question of proving the same for being used as evidence against the maker (one of the accused ) does not arise at all...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- Appeal against acquittal - Held, it is settled law that any acquittal order cannot be lightly interfered with by appellate Court, though it has wide powers to review evidence and to come to its own conclusion - Power to grant leave must be exercised with care and caution because presumption of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Additional accused - Summoning of - Exercise of power - Held, power u/s 319 Cr.P.C. is an extra ordinary power which may be used very sparingly only if compelling or cogent reasons exist against the person sought to be summoned - Term `evidence' used in S.319 Cr.P.C. does not necessarily mean the..........

Showing : 1011-1020 of 2295 Results