Showing : 1091-1100 of 2027 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, 386-- Appeal against acquittal - If trial court's judgment is well based on the evidence and the conclusion drawn in favour of the accused was possible thereof, High Court would not be justified in interfering on the premise that a different view could also be taken and though the High Court was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164-- Evidentiary value of statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. - Statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. can never be used as substantive evidence of truth of the facts but may be used for contradictions and corroboration of a witness who made it and it can be used to cross examine the maker of it and the result may..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154-- FIR - Certain fact not mentioned in FIR - This is of no consequence - FIR does not constitute substantive evidence - It can only be used as a previous statement for the purposes of either corroborating its maker or for contradicting him and in such a case the previous statement cannot be used..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Summoning order - Lack of jurisdiction - Summoning order not to be challenged in the higher Court - Instead an application be filed in the trial Court who after hearing both sides and recording evidence, if necessary, decide the question of jurisdiction before proceeding further with the case...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of criminal proceedings - Exercise of inherent powers - Held, proceedings can be quashed in cases in which allegations made against accused in complaint or in FIR do not constitute any offence, even though those allegations are taken at their face value and are accepted in their entirety..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Quashing of complaint on the ground that mandate of S.141 of the Act not complied with - Held, while deciding a petition u/s 482 of the Code, Court cannot insist the complainant to produce documents to substantiate his case - Being the complainant, it is for him to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154-- FIR - Not a substantive piece of evidence - FIR can be used to corroborate the evidence of the person lodging the same...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164-- Statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. is not substantive evidence and can be utilized only to corroborate or contradict the witness vis-a-vis statement made in Court - It can be only utilized as a previous statement and nothing more...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), 202-- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. treated as a complaint case - A case already registered at concerned Police Station and charge sheet submitted - Entire evidence available with the applicant - No illegality in impugned order...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 216-- Additional charge - Framed u/ss 302/149 and 307/149 IPC - Considering evidence of two doctors Court framed the additional charge - In the opinion of Doctor, ante-mortem injuries were sufficient to cause death in normal circumstances - Accused can be convicted under the said provisions of law only..........

Showing : 1091-1100 of 2027 Results