Showing : 6091-6100 of 14158 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of Directors - Quashing of proceedings - Respondent/complainant has not specified role of Directors in day-to-day affairs of company - Held, pleadings for proceeding against petitioners as an accused u/s.138 of the Act as Directors of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Cognizance of offences - Quashing of - Cognizance of offences punishable u/ss 147, 504, 506, 352, 323, 325 and 308 of IPC - Held, from perusal of material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against applicants - All..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154-- FIR - Object of lodging - Held, to set in motion criminal justice system by reporting an offence when the FIR mentions essential fact or broad picture about it - It is considered as an information for police to take cognizance of offence reported - FIR is not expected to be verbatim summary of..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304A-- Death due to medical negligence - Prosecution of Doctor - Quashing of - Quashing of prosecution sought on the ground that there are two different opinions from two sets of Doctors - Held, High Court u/s.482 Cr.P.C. cannot make a roving enquiry so as to give a finding as to which among two opinions..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 203, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 427, 506, 323-- Dismissal of complaint - Validity - Court below has not discussed evidence to show that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against accused person - Statement of complainant u/s 200 Cr.P.C. and statement of witnesses u/s.202 Cr.P.C. are unrebutted - There is no cross examination by Court..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397(2), 111-- Interlocutory order passed u/ss 107/111 Cr.P.C. - Revision against - Maintainability - Held, revision not maintainable as S.397 (2) Cr.P.C. bars the exercise of revisional jurisdiction of High Court and Sessions Judge with respect to such an order...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of MD - Quashing of proceedings - At the time of presentation of cheque petitioner was Managing Director of accused No.1-Corporation - Held, petitioner is prima facie answerable to claim - At this stage, it is not permissible for petitioner to..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 374-- Appeal against conviction - Bail - First dying declaration was recorded when deceased was under the total control of accused persons - Statement of DW-4 who recorded second dying declaration of deceased appears dubious since no FIR was lodged by that time regarding the incident - Held,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 320-- Offence u/s 304-B - Compromise - FIR against husband and his family members - During investigation all the accused except husband found innocent - Challan against husband not yet put up - Parties compromising - Complainant stated that he was wrongly briefed by neighbours - FIR quashed in view of..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 162(1), Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145-- Statement of witness recorded by I.O. by audio video means - May be treated to be a statement which has been reduced into writing, fulfilling the requirement of S.162(2) Proviso Cr.P.C. - Before a witness can be contradicted with reference to his previous statement made before the IO u/s 162..........

Showing : 6091-6100 of 14158 Results