Showing : 781-790 of 896 Results

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 14, 13, 116-- Delay of 5 years in filing appeal - Partition order passed by Assistant Collector - Party filed civil suit for setting aside order of partition - Suit dismissed and so also appeal against it on the ground that Civil Court has no jurisdiction in the matter and remedy lay to approach Revenue..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Explanation if does not smack of mala fides or not put forth as part of dilatory strategy - Court must show utmost consideration to suitor - In every case of delay - Can be some lapse on part of litigant - That alone not enough to turn down plea for condonation of delay ...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - If reasonable ground to think that delay occasioned by party deliberately to gain time - Court should lean against acceptance of explanation for delay...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Application to set aside ex parte decree - Delay of 883 days - Delay caused due to failure of advocate to inform appellant as well as his failure to take action - Found to be satisfactory by trial Court - High Court in revision setting aside the same - Not proper - Court..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Length of delay - Does not matter - Only criterion - Acceptability of explanation - Section 5 does not say that discretion in condonation of delay can be exercised only if delay within a certain limit - Sometimes delay of shortest range may be uncondonable due to a want of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay in filing appeal by State - Preferential treatment in terms of State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani's case JT 1996(3) SC 371 - Pre - supposes bona fide act and responsible attitude on the part of State and its Officers - A remedy when gets barred by time, a definite right is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of more that 350 days in filing appeal by State - Appeal not accompanied by application under Section 5 - Returned by Registry - Re - filed accompanied by application under Section 5 - Delay to be explained from the date judgment pronounced to the date when appeal filed accompanied with..........
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Cause of action arose on 16.12.1993 - Complaint filed on 22.3.1996 - Complaint filed after lapse of around four months from the date on which the limitation expired for filing of complaint - Complainant did not move any application for condonation of delay before the District Forum -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Not applying for certified copy of judgment - No ground for condonation of delay per se...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay application - Must be supported by a proper affidavit - Affidavit in support of application typed and attested before application itself typed - Not proper affidavit - Means that application and its contents not known to person who had sworn affidavit in support of..........

Showing : 781-790 of 896 Results