Showing : 251-260 of 401 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Examination held in June, 1991 - Result allegedly not declared till 2003 - Complaint filed in 2006 - No application for condonation of delay seeking condonation of delay - Exchange of correspondence does not extend the period of limitation - Complaint not maintainable and is clearly..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(1)(a)(ii)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Copy of order supplied by State Commission free of cost to petitioner - After several months of the passing of the order to cover up delay application made for grant of certified copy by petitioner - Insurance Company - The reasons on the basis..........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 377, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Duty of court - Held, while considering prayer for condonation of delay explanation put forward in application should be considered along with merits of appeal and if it is found that serious point of law have been raised in appeal application for condonation of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article 123-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Limitation - Starts to run from the date of knowledge of exparte decree - However, in case summons were duly served then limitation starts to run from the date of exparte decree - Application filed beyond period of limitation - Condonation of delay neither sought..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 588 days in filing revision - Application does not disclose sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay - Application dismissed - Revision too dismissed as barred by limitation...........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 89 days - Ground that delay due to sending of the order sent to Head Office for taking decision to the file the appeal - No details as to at what level the delay occurred explained - The reasons given in the application taken..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 299 days - Totally vague ground stated - No details as to at what level the delay occurred explained - The reasons given in the application taken at their face value carry no conviction - Not possible to hold that there was..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 120, 121-- Appeal - Abatement for not bringing on record L.R's within time - Application to set aside abatement of appeal filed within time - Held, application is not maintainable where condonation of delay in bringing legal representative of deceased respondent was not sought for by making separate..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appeal by Govt. Deptt - No special provisions though there is lengthy process is alleged to be involved - There could be delay of few days or few weeks - Delay of over one year - Application does not sufficiently explain the delay caused - Valuable right has accrued..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Plot allotment - Cause of action had arisen on the basis of offer of possession of the plot made on 29.9.2000 - Complaint came to be filed on 9.10.2003 - No application for condonation of delay in terms of requirements of Section 24A of the Act moved - Complaint liable to be dismissed..........

Showing : 251-260 of 401 Results