Showing : 1-10 of 27 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7-- Illegal gratification - Order taking cognizance - Petitioner being a Patwari demanded bribe for issuance of bonafide residence certificate - However, no evidence on record to show that there is any specific demand for making a bonafide residence certificate - Rather, petitioner had mentioned in..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 20-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Clinching evidence on record against accused regarding demand of bribe and factum of receiving bribe by accused - Tainted money recovered from accused - Phenolphthalein test was positive - PWs categorically stated the incident - Tape recorded..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Accused being I.O. in the case filed against complainant, demanded bribe of Rs.5000 from complainant for initiating action/kalandra against his neighbours - However, said neighbours already arrested and released on bail without making any demand of..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance of Rs.2000 as bribe - Complainant disowned her own complaint and stated that accused never demanded any amount of illegal gratification from her - Shadow witness also admitted that accused did not initiate any demand but complainant voluntarily handed..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 8, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - A-2 allegedly demanded Rs.2,000 on behalf of A-1 for installation of electricity meter in the house of complainant - However, it is proved on record that A-2 was working as a private contractor and not known to A-1 - Evidential fact were not established by prosecution in..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 5(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Accused being assistant in DT office allegedly demanded bribe from complainant for registration of vehicle - No evidence on record that complainant was real owner of vehicle - Genesis of illegal demand is not proved on record - Even motive for illegal demand also not proved..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused apprehended for acceptance of bribe amount of Rs.300 which he demanded from complainant for clearance of pension dues - Complainant turned hostile and stated that bribe was not demanded by accused - Accused convicted despite hostile statement of complainant as..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused allegedly demanded Rs.1500 from complainant but he paid only 250 out of which accused returned 50 to complainant as he had no money left - It casts a serious shadow of doubt on sequence of events - None of PWs actually deposed that accused demanded and accepted..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Mere fact that complainant and shadow witness turned hostile is itself no ground to record acquittal of accused - As it is not necessary that demand and acceptance of bribe must be proved by direct evidence - Same can be established from circumstantial evidence available on..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused alleged to have demanded Rs.200/- for extra copies of death certificate from complainant - Complainant not supported prosecution case - Even from Panch witness there is no clear indication that there was conscious demand or conscious acceptance of bribe by accused -..........

Showing : 1-10 of 27 Results