Showing : 81-89 of 89 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- A - Additional evidence in a suit for mandatory injunction against alleged encroachment of certain portion of property in dispute - Evidence of parties already recorded - Copy of demarcation report of a later date - Could not be produced with due diligence - Allowed to be produced as additional..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence - Demarcation report of the abadi deh of village came into being after the close of evidence by the petitioner - Petitioner shall be granted an opportunity to produce the said report with a corresponding right to the respondent to take all legal factual pleas available under..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Demarcation Report came into being after petitioners closed their evidence - Could not have produced the Report when leading evidence - Justified in seeking permission to produce additional evidence - Objection that Report not relevant as same prepared during pendency of proceedings at the back of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Rules, 1956, Rule 20A, 20B, 20C, 20D- - Surplus land has to be allotted to a tenant already ejected or likely to be ejected for resettlement - After allotment of surplus area to a tenant - Certificate in Form K-6 describing clearly land allotted is issued, copies whereof sent to Patwari concerned as also landowner on whose land tenant..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER HARYANA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 177, 175-- Disqualification on ground of illegal possession of Gram Panchayat land - Only way to prove encroachment on land vested in Gram Panchayat - To have finding to that effect under Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act - Photostat copy of Demarcation Report - Not per se admissible - Without..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 177, 175-- Illegal possession of Panchayat land - Demarcation report of Local Commissioner and revenue record in the shape of Khasra Girdawari produced - No evidence led to rebut this evidence - Finding of illegal possession cannot be said to be based on no proper evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 324, 34, Haryana Canal and Drainage Act, 1974, Section 24-- Digging of khal by accused - On protest complainants assaulted - Accused claiming right of private defence on being assaulted by complainant and others - Patwari, a prosecution witness deposed that life demarcated land two days prior to date of incident - His statement disbelieved by High Court on..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 203(1)(c)-- Municipal Committee framed a Town Planning Scheme under Section 203 - Only 4061 Sq. yds. of land shown on plan of Scheme as against 4961 Sq. yds. as per revenue record - On getting demarcation done found that land measuring 4961 Sq. yds. included in the Scheme - Action of Authorities in proceeding..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1971
Details
Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, Section 30-- Limitation Act (36 of IV63), Article 97 - Taking of actual physical possession - Mere demarcation or pointing out of plots by vendor - Not enough. By the mere fact that the vendor had demarcated the plots or pointed them out, the vendee had not taken actual physical possession. (Para 13) Where..........

Showing : 81-89 of 89 Results