LawMirror.com

Results of dishonour of cheque expert opinion

Showing : 1-10 of 62 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Non consideration of petition filed by accused - Execution of cheque proved - Held, mere non consideration of petition filed by accused is not a matter which accused can canvass as a ground which caused prejudice to his defence...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion regarding signatures therein - In reply notice plea of security cheque raised - Held, in absence of any dispute raised by accused in reply notice with regard to issuing cheque in favour of complainant, trial Court was not justified in allowing prayer for..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Plea of giving blank cheque - In a complaint of dishonour of cheque complainant merely has to prove that a signed cheque was given by accused - Whether cheque was filled in by petitioner or by complainant is an immaterial fact - Order rejecting..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Friendly loan - Expert opinion that signature on cheque do not tally with specimen signatures - Court examined disputed signatures with other signatures of accused on various documents on record and found alleged signatures entirely different - Complaint collapses on this short ground - Complaint..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Opinion of handwriting expert - Seeking opinion of handwriting expert is right to defend - Any order rejecting such request to refer any document for examination by an expert for his opinion which is a step in aid of his defence amounts to the deprival of the right..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Accused without himself entering into witness box, seeking sending of cheque to Handwriting expert - Application cannot be allowed...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Expert opinion - Dishonour of cheque - Determination of age of handwriting and age of signatures - As of now there are no scientific and technical facilities available in India to scientifically determine age of the handwritings and signatures in a cheque - No useful purpose would be subserved..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Comparison of signatures by handwriting expert - No specific plea taken by accused as to amount, date and beneficiary name in the disputed cheque - Even no prayer was made by accused as to on what aspect handwriting expert would..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Disputed signatures - Opinion of handwriting expert - Application filed when case was fixed for recording statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Cheque in question was not returned on account of dissimilarity in signature of accused - Accused did not file any complaint..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, 73 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Admittedly, accused denied his signatures on cheque, but said issue not raised in trial Court but same raised in appellate Court - No adverse inference can be drawn because it all depends upon advocate who represent accused and his legal accuman and..........

Showing : 1-10 of 62 Results