Showing : 1-10 of 63 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Restoration of suit - Dismissed in default - Suit dismissed on three occasions - Court allowed restoration application twice and dismissed the same on third occasion - Stage of suit was for filing replication, however, same was not filed on all three occasions - Conduct of plaintiff highly..........
TELANGANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 1514 days in filing application for restoration of suit dismissed in default - Plaintiff pleaded that suit dismissed for default as he was in coma - However, plaintiff completely failed to produce any evidence with respect to his assertion that he was in coma, which..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after about seven months - Such delay cannot be said to be inordinate delay - In case delay is not that inordinate and other party can be monetarily compensated, then Court rather than following a..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 122-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Statutory period for filing restoration application is the date of order and not knowledge of order - Condonation of delay is not permissible in absence of an application - No permission can be granted to an aggrieved party for filing an application for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Plaintiff was present in almost all hearings before trial Court which indicates that he was genuinely pursuing the matter - Application for restoration of suit filed within period of limitation - Plaintiff having filed the suit for declaration and..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after delay of 18 months - Appellant was aware about dismissal of suit still he knowingly failed to file application for restoration within prescribed period - Application rightly rejected...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay of 513 days - Plea of illness and non intimation of dismissal by counsel - Said plea not substantiated by plaintiff - Even delay of 513 days in approaching Court not explained by plaintiff - Application for restoration of suit rightly..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(c)-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Defendant duly represented and it was plaintiff who did not appear - Order of dismissal of suit is U.O.9.R.8 CPC - Rejection of application for restoration of suit is covered U.O.43.R.1(c) CPC - Factual mistake committed by lower Appellate Court that..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 3, 4-- Restoration of suit - Suit dismissed in default U.O.9.R.3 - Both parties absent - No notice had been sent to counsel or parties with respect to change of date - Case of plaintiffs is that they wrongly noted date and then moved an application for restoration within 1 month of date they had noted -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, R-- Restoration of suit dismissed for default - No delay in moving an application for restoration - Mistake in noting date of case - Rules of procedure are meant for advancing cause of justice - Both parties must be granted due opportunity to put up their best case before court - Suit restored...........

Showing : 1-10 of 63 Results