Showing : 81-90 of 197 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 74-- Public document - Proof of public documents need not to be proved by examining the authors of those documents...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(d), 5(2)-- Illegal gratification - Conviction - Validity - Accused alleged to have demanded bribe of Rs.200 from complainant for passing bills of his retirement benefits - Verifier was only partly examined by prosecution - Even if verifier proved documents which indicated verification of demand at earlier..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 63, 65-- Secondary evidence - Photostat copy - Law as to - Analysed - (a) Photostat copy of a document can be allowed to be produced only in absence of original document; (b) When a party seeks to produce Photostat copy it has to lay the foundational facts by proving that original document existed and is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65-- Secondary evidence - Photostat copy - Principles governing are : (a) Photostat copy of a document can be allowed to be produced only in absence of original document; (b) When a party seeks to produce Photostat copy it has to lay the foundational facts by proving that original document existed and..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 77-- Certified copy of sale deed, is a public document, as it is a public record kept in the Registration Department of the State of a private document - It need not to be proved by calling a witness...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Document obtained by illegal means -- Even if a document is procured by improper or illegal means, there is no bar to its admissibility if it is relevant and its genuineness is proved - If evidence is admissible, it does not matter how it has been obtained...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - A Will is required to be attested by two witnesses but it can be proved by examining one of the attesting witnesses - However, one of the requirements of due execution of a Will is its attestation by two or more witnesses, which is mandatory - Aid of S.71 Evidence Act can be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 34-- Illegal gratification - Traffic violation - Accused took away the documents of the vehicle - Accused asked to pay Rs.100/- towards illegal gratification - Recovery of tainted money from the pocked of appellant - Presence of accused at the place of occurrence established - Accused directed the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65-- Secondary evidence - Proof of loss - Not so strict in the case of a registered document - Plea of loss of original can be proved by way of affidavit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65(a)-- Secondary evidence - May be given of the existence, condition or contents of a document when the original is shown or appears to be in the possession or power of the person against whom the document is sought to be proved, or of any person out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the..........

Showing : 81-90 of 197 Results