Showing : 21-30 of 66 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12-- Proceedings u/s 12 of the Act, at the instance of second wife - Maintainability - Sufficient material on record to infer that relationship between petitioner and respondent as husband and wife, such as marriage photographs, date of birth certificate of their daughter, name of petitioner being..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(a)-- Aggrieved person - In addition to a woman who is in a domestic relationship, any woman who has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent, if alleges to have been subjected to act of domestic violence by the respondent, come within meaning of "aggrieved person"...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(f)-- Domestic relationship arises in respect of an aggrieved person if the aggrieved person had lived together with respondent in a shared household - Living together can be either soon before filing of petition or `at any point of time'...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, 23-- Divorced wife - Interim maintenance - Wife subjected to an act constituting domestic violence while she was in domestic relationship with the respondent during subsistence of marriage - Held, application is maintainable - Award of Rs.5000/- as interim maintenance against husband whose take home..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(a), 2(f), 2(q)-- Domestic violence - Even if husband is not a party to the proceedings, respondent should be one related to aggrieved person through the husband by matrimonial relationship or a relationship in the nature of marriage and must have shared a household at any point of time and has committed the..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 18(a), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438-- Protection order - Violation - Anticipatory bail - While passing order u/s 18(a) of Act, Magistrate shall not direct that respondent is prohibited from doing any act of domestic violence - Act sought to be prohibited shall be specifically stated in the order, nature of which shall depend on the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12-- Domestic violence - Transfer of complaint - Respondent claiming herself to be an old female filed a complaint at place `A' - Complaint may be frivolous or a mode to harass the petitioners - Same cannot be transferred from place at `A' to place at `L' as the same can be contested through Advocate -..........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(f)-- Domestic relationship - When any person who is so related who has been not living or had not lived together at any point of time with the aggrieved person in a shared household and who has/had no domestic relationship cannot be made a respondent to a case filed by woman under the provisions of the..........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(f)-- Domestic relationship - Aggrieved person and the respondent need not be living together in a shared household at the time of filing of case/petition and it would be sufficient if they had lived together at any point of time in the past, when the alleged acts/omissions/conduct complained of had..........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Domestic violence - Vague and general allegations against petitioners - Petitioners are distantly related to husband of respondent No.2 - No averment in the petition nor any material placed on record to show that petitioners are having or had any domestic relationship with respondent No.2 -..........

Showing : 21-30 of 66 Results