Showing : 51-60 of 66 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(a)-- Aggrieved person - Divorced wife - No matrimonial relationship exists between parties - Marriage stood annulled - Held, status of respondent cannot be equated with woman who has been in domestic relationship as envisaged in the definition provided u/s 2(a) of the Act - She cannot be said to be..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(a)-- "Aggrieved person" - Definition - Held, definition of "aggrieved person" does not restrict it to woman in her capacity as `wife' alone - Essential is only that an aggrieved person is or has been in a `domestic relation' with respondent - Act is not confined only to take care of relationship of..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s)-- Shared household - Meaning - Held, shared household means a household where person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with respondent and includes such a household whether owned or tenanted either jointly by aggrieved person and respondent,..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12,2(q)-- Cruelty to wife - Marriage between petitioner and respondent already stood dissolved by decree of divorce - No jural relationship between them exists at the time of filing of case under Domestic violence Act - Complainant is silent as to dates when alleged violations under the Act have occurred -..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, 18, 19, 20-- It is not necessary that woman should have a marriage subsisting and existing at the time of filing of application u/s 12 of the Act - No time period is prescribed as to when the aggrieved person should have been in domestic relationship with the respondent - No time limit is prescribed in the Act..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 27, 12-- Territorial jurisdiction - The forum for entertaining an application u/s 12 of the Act is Judicial Magistrate of First Class or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, within the local limits of whom (a) the aggrieved person permanently or temporarily resides or carries on business or is..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23(1), 23(2), 31(1)-- Domestic violence - Failure to appear and pay maintenance - Issuance of non bailable warrant - Permissibility - Held, Magistrate, on passing an order u/s.23(1) or an ex parte order u/s.23(2) of the Act of 2005 cannot direct arrest of respondent by issuing non bailable warrant before taking..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12-- Complaint - Expression `complaint' found in the Act and Rules is used in a generic sense and is not to be understood in the context of a complaint as defined under Cr.P.C. - Respondent who is the opposite party to such application is not an accused as such he cannot be arrested and produced or..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 22-- Interim order allowing stay/reside in house and awarding maintenance of Rs.10, 000/- per month - Order upheld in appeal but maintenance reduced to Rs.6, 000/- p.m. - Husband expired - Order did not specify as to which of the respondent out of the five would be liable to make the payment and why -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12-- Wife lived with husband in USA for 7-1/2 years - Husband obtained decree of divorce from superior court of New Jersey - Wife filed complaint in the court at Delhi under Domestic Violence Act - Besides husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law also arrayed as respondents - Both the..........

Showing : 51-60 of 66 Results