Showing : 481-490 of 614 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 304B, 34, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4-- Dowry death - Burn injury - Acquittal of husband, his parents and brother - Deceased suffered 100% burn injuries in house of accused - Evidence of parents and brother of deceased that deceased was harassed on account of dowry demand did not appear to be worthy of credence - Victim got admitted in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 498A-- Dowry death - Incident within statutory limit - Conviction of husband, his father and mother - Acquittal of brother of husband - Case of mother and father identical to that of brother - Acquittal of brother on finding that demand of dowry not specifically established - Conviction of father and..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 306-- Offence u/ss 306, 498-A IPC - Conviction of husband, brother and his wife - Wife harassed for failure to conceive for 2/3 years after marriage and for not bringing sufficient dowry - Story invented to provide motive as deceased gave birth to male child a year before incident - No evidence to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 468A-- Dowry death - Finding of trial Court that accused might have given some kick blows in the abdomen or on private part of deceased when she was pregnant and for this reason she might have died - This was not the case of prosecution at all - These observations of trial Court found to be beyond..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B-- Dowry death - Demand of Ten thousand rupees after four years of marriage - Demand not believable as accused and deceased doing labour work and also for the reason that earlier an amount of Rs.5,000/- paid after borrowing and person from money borrowed not examined to prove this fact - Held,..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 304B, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4, 6-- Dowry death - Death within 7 years of marriage - Demand and harassment and cruelty towards deceased - Conviction of husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law - Letters written by deceased revealed torture and harassment undergone by deceased - Genuineness of letters not challenged - Letters..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 498A, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 113A-- Dowry death - Demand of colour television about 2-1/2 months earlier - This is not demand for dowry immediately before death - Demand of colour television can be a form of cruelty punishable u/s 498-A IPC - Presumption under S.113 Evidence Act applies - Act of appellant would be punishable u/s 306..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 323, 294, 506, 34-- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, S.4, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Ss.482 and 156(3) - Quashing of proceedings - Petitioner charge-sheeted under Ss.498A, 323, 294, 506/34 IPC and S.4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 on a complaint filed by complainant under S.156(3) Cr.P.C. - No evidence on record..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 113B-- Dowry death - To convict an accused u/s 304-B after raising the presumption u/s 113-B of Evidence Act, prosecution must prove that soon before her death, the victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment - Prosecution has also to rule out the possibility of a natural or accidental death so as to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4, 6-- Dowry demand - Amount of Rs.10,000/- paid through PW2 and PW7 - PW7 did not state in her deposition that she had gone with PW2 to hand over the amount to the appellant whereas PW2 stated that she had gone with PW7 to pay the amount - It is not the case of the defence that PW7 denied having gone to..........

Showing : 481-490 of 614 Results