Showing : 41-48 of 48 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 27(b)(ii), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 100(4)-- Raid by Drug Inspector - Recovery of drugs which accused was not authorised to possess - Independent witnesses not joined - Drug Inspector joined two doctors from his own department - They cannot be said to be independent witnesses - Conviction set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Criminal trial-- Independent witnesses - Raid by Drug Inspector - Independent witnesses not joined - Two doctors from his own department joined - They cannot be said to be independent witnesses - Conviction under Drugs and Cosmetics Act set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 25(3)-- Drug - Sample found to be sub-standard by Govt. Analyst - Second sample not sent to Central Drugs Laboratory for test inspite of request to this effect by accused - Complaint filed when shelf life of drug had expired - Complaint quashed - Held, if the accused is summoned when shelf life of drug..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 179, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 16(1)(a), 18(a)(i, S.27(d)-- Adulterated drug - Manufacturer can be prosecuted at the place of sale of adulterated drug irrespective of whether seller of drug has been made party or not...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 25(4)-- Adulterated drug - Sample reached Central Drugs Laboratory after expiry date of sample - Valuable right vested in accused u/s 25(4) lost - Continuation of the proceedings in the circumstances against the petitioners would amount to abuse of process of law and as such the proceedings quashed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(a)(i), 34, 27(d), Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rule 76-- Drug/injection - Sub standard quality - Allegation that sample contained suspended matter - It was not the prosecution case that the drug or injection contained any foreign material - Development of particles may be due to non observance of standard of storage in a cool place - No prima facie case..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(a)(i), 34-- Drug/injection - Sub standard quality - Partners of firm - No averment in the complaint that partners were incharge of the business of the firm - Held, prosecution against them not sustainable...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18A, 28-- Applicability - The person to whom S.18A applies is anyone other than a manufacturer or his agent for distribution thereof - Acquittal of respondent based on reasoning that S.18A would apply `only if the person from whom the requisite information is sought for, is either the manufacturer or an..........

Showing : 41-48 of 48 Results