Showing : 31-40 of 49 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(9)(b)(c), 27(b)(ii)-- Appellants were manufacturer of Ayurvedic medicines - Ozomen capsules which has a component of sildenafil citrate which is an allopathic drug and it cannot be used by anybody else unless a person who holds licence for it - Appellant had no licence - Liable for offences u/s 18(a)(b)(c) punishable..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940-- Chapter IV - Competency of Inspectors to launch prosecution - Held, that appellant used a allopathic drug for which he had no licence - So offence has been committed under Chapter IV of the Act also - Held, that Inspector appointed under Chapter IV is competent to launch prosecution...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 25(4)-- Drugs - Recovery of - Sample found sub standard - Accused sent two communications to Drug Inspector for sending Fourth sample to Central Drugs Laboratory for re-test - No action taken - Challan put up in Court when only one month was left for expiry date of drug - It was impossible to get the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 22, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18, 23-- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985, Rule 66(1) - Petitioner a registered pharmacist, got a licence to sell, stock and distribute drugs - As per rule 66(1) any person holding valid drug licence can stock for sale the drugs in question after following the conditions as laid down..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rule 63-- Drug licence - Renewal - Rule 63 says that if application is made within 6 months of its expiry after the payment of additional fees, licence shall continue to be in force until orders are passed on the application - Petitioners case is that immediately after expiry of licence he moved an..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18, 34, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of proceedings - Sample of drug found not conforming to standard quality - Prosecution of Sales Manager - No allegation in complaint that accused was in-charge of the company and/or was also responsible to the company for the conduct of its business at the time when alleged offence was..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 25(3), (4)-- Drug - Substandard - Applicant after receipt of report of Govt. Analyst notified Drug Inspector in writing his intention to adduce evidence to controvert report of Govt. Analyst - Even thereafter Drug Inspector filed complaint in Court after lapse of five months - Applicant served after around..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18-- Contravention of the provisions of the Act - Drug Inspector to file complaint with the Magistrate - FIR cannot be lodged...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 7, 17A, 17B, 18, 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Pre-arrest bail - Offence u/ss 17/17A/17B/18/27 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act and S.420 IPC - FIR lodged - S.18 provides that in case of contravention of the provisions of the Act, complaint is to be filed by the Drug Inspector with Magistrate and no FIR is to be registered - Offence u/s 420 IPC how..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 17, 17A, 17B, 18, 27-- Contravention of provisions of Act - Complaint by Drug Inspector lies with Magistrate and no FIR is to be registered...........

Showing : 31-40 of 49 Results