Showing : 301-310 of 1065 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlord needed both the demised shops for his two sons who were unemployed - Sons well versed in the work of shawls and clothes and want the premises to do their job therein - Tenant opposed eviction application alleging that landlord had constructed four other shops and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- Leave to defend - NRI landlord sought eviction of tenants from six shops on ground of bonafide requirement - Four shops lying vacant with landlord - Held, landlord ought to have broadly stated as to what kind of business he intended to start - He ought to state whether four shops, which are lying..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlady not entering the witness box - Proof of bonafide requirement through son, her power of attorney - Held, plea of bona fide requirement can be proved by son when he is intricately linked and related to the landlady and adequately enabled to give out and substantiate..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)-- Eviction sought on the ground that building is unsafe and unfit for human habitation - Evidence that verandah of shop had fallen down, roof also damaged, cracks in the walls visible and support given to roof with ballies - Held, building has become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Eviction..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide requirement - Landlord's sons doing business in rented shop - Demised shop required for sons who want to do business therein - Held, tenant cannot insist that landlord's sons should continue to do business in the rented premises - Plea that landlord of rented shops in occupation of sons..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- Bonafide requirement - NRI landlord sought eviction of tenant from demised premises by availing remedy of summary eviction - Petitioner contended that when eviction of tenant has already been ordered, landlord cannot avail remedy of summary eviction u/s 13-B of the Act - Held, if there are more..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Eviction petition - Leave to defend - Delay - Applicability of Limitation Act, 1963 - Held, Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable - Rent authority deemed to be Court only for limited and specific purposes - Rent authority has no power to condone delay in filing leave to defend...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlord requiring tenanted shop for his unemployed son who is settled abroad and also wants to settle himself in a business as he stood retired from the Govt. service - Tenant resisted petition alleging that both sons of landlord are well settled - Held, every citizen as..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlord filed eviction application seeking demised premises for setting up his law library as his present office had fallen to share of other family members in family settlement - Need of landlord held to be bonafide...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i), 13(4)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlord filed eviction application seeking demised premises for setting up his law library as his present office had fallen to share of other family members in family settlement - Tenant contended that landlord has every intention not to settle in the demised premises after..........

Showing : 301-310 of 1065 Results