LawMirror.com

Results of east punjab urban rent restriction s 13b

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 247 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction petition - Leave to defend - It is apparent that previous tenancy on first floor was never pleaded in application for leave to defend - Still further, in absence of any material that accommodation on first floor is sufficient, leave to defend cannot be granted - Still further, landlord cannot be forced..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction petition - Leave to defend - Tenants have not produced any material to show that premises was let out to electronic security systems - Rather landlord has produced rent deed to prove that separate portions were let out to petitioners herein, who are two brothers - Hence, even if rent has been paid for..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction petition - Leave to defend - It is apparent that apart from shop number, landlady had also identified property by giving description of properties situated in all four directions - Tenants themselves claim that they are in possession of shop which is a part of bigger building - Thus, there is no dispute..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 18A -- Eviction petition - NRI landlord - There is no bar for a Non-resident Indian to get a building of choice vacated u/s 13-B of the Act...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 18A -- Eviction petition - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - Tenant cannot dictate how much space is adequate for proposed business venture or to suggest that available space with landlord will be adequate...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2021
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 18A -- Eviction petition - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - Landlord needed premises for proposed business - Status of landlord as NRI is not in dispute - Contention of tenant is that space available for landlord would be adequate for purposed business and there is no need to seek eviction of tenants from their..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Punjab Rent Act, 1995, Section 38(7)(c), East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction petition - NRI landlord - Non filing of affidavit along with leave to contest application - To contest petition for eviction, application for leave is to be specific stating grounds on which he seeks to contest petition for eviction - Rent Authority, thus u/s..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 18A -- Eviction petition - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - No sale deed has been produced by landlords to prove their ownership - However, jamabandi has been produced on file which carries presumption of correctness - Perusal of jamabandi it is apparent that landlords are owner of property - Even, passports prove..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13, 13B -- Eviction petition - Leave to contest - U/s 13 of the Act, ejectment of tenant can be sought by landowner on various grounds specified therein - In petition u/s 13 of the Act, tenant is not required to seek leave to contest - Tenant is permitted to contest petition in accordance with law - Thus, eviction of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction petition - Delivery of immediate possession - Leave to contest - Landlords not disclosed that they have already taken possession of adjoining shops - It is also not case of landlords that aforesaid shops are not in their possession - It is also not in dispute that first floor of tenanted premises in..........

Showing : 1-10 of 247 Results