Showing : 1-10 of 12 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Electricity Act, 2004, Section 54, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Section 42, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 10-- Laying electric head lines - Temporary injunction to restrain defendants from laying the over head electric lines etc. - The licensee under the Electricity Act and the Telegraph Act does not acquire any land, it only makes use of the land for the purpose of laying electric line for which..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Restraining electricity board from erecting electric poles and passing the electric wires - Held, Punjab State Electricity Board is empowered under the relevant provisions of law, to erect poles and lay lines in the fields of any private person - The only remedy available..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Electricity supply-- Interruption of power supply as one of the electrical Poles fell down - No action taken despite bringing the same to the notice of OP - On the basis of Investigation report of the SDO of the Department findings recorded by the District Forum that the electric line was damaged due to the negligence..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Electricity-- Crop damage - Complainant claiming damages for loss of sugarcane crops, coconut trees and chikku trees which were burnt because of sparking from the electric wires passing over the field of the complainant - Distance between the poles was too much and the wires were hanging loose due to distance -..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Electrocution-- Injury suffered on coming into contact with live electric wire hanging at low altitude - Very fact that live electric wire aligned to poles had loosened itself and sagged and was hanging at low altitude, is sufficient to infer that Electricity Board was negligent in maintaining transmission lines..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 12-- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Prior permission of District Magistrate or Commissioner of Police -Necessary only when objection raised by owner before completion of work - Owner did not raise objection before completion of work - Provisions of S.12 not attracted...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 42-- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Absence of sanctioned scheme - Provisions of S.42 not attracted...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 51, 10-- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Consent or prior intimation to owner of private property is not necessary - Owner has only right to claim compensation...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 10, 51-- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Compensation - Quantum - Delay of more than 15 years in paying compensation - Board directed to pay Rs.2, 500/- by way of compensation including damages to owner...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1992
Details
Electricity-- Installing of poles and drawing of power lines in the land of the petitioner in order to give electric connection to the neighbour - The provision of S.29 of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 as to publication of scheme in official gazette and in local newspaper is mandatory - Object of the scheme is..........

Showing : 1-10 of 12 Results