LawMirror.com

Results of electricity bill

Showing : 81-90 of 151 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Electricity -- Defective meter - Supplementary bill - Oral admission of consumer as to defective meter has no legal sanctity - Dispute as to defective meter has to be referred to Electrical Inspector - Without resorting to this procedure, Electricity Board is not competent to issue supplementary bill or demand in respect thereof or disconnect the electricity connection for..........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Electricity bill - Rebate - Delay of 4-1/2 years in giving rebate to the respondent-complainant - Held to be deficiency in service - Grant of compensation of Rs.4,000/- by the District Forum held justified...........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Indian Electricity Act, 1910, Section 26(6) -- Electricity bill - For 44 months - Plea of the complainant that as per provision of Section 26(6) of the 1910 Act respondents could raise bill for six months repelled - Section 26(6) speaks about defective meter hence it will not be applicable - It was due to non payment of..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Electricity bill -- Issuance of at commercial rate - Residential place where no commercial activities are carried out, issuing bill for commercial use held to be deficiency in service...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Electricity bill - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Electricity bills for consumption of electric energy not regularly issued during the period 1994 to 2000 - One consolidated bill for 6 years for a sum of Rs. 26,408/- as charges of electricity consumption on average basis issued instead of on basis of..........

ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Electricity Bill -- For alleged unauthorised drawal of power - Raising the bill against the original consumer number for unauthorised drawal of power from another source is something not permissible and acceptable under law - If somebody is unauthorisedly drawing power his line has to be disconnected penalty can be imposed or steps may be taken under the electricity act -..........

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Electricity bill -- Raising of bill of Rs. 34,974/- on average basis of 2926 units on the ground that house was locked - The meter number to which bill was raised as per the version of complainant taken away by Municipal Corporation employees on 31.3.2001 when his shop was demolished - Direction by District Forum to revise the bill on the basis of actual meter reading or..........

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Electricity bill -- Amount outstanding against one connection added to the bill of another connection related to the complainant-respondent - No law shown which permitted the amount outstanding against one connection that could be added in the bill of another connection if the demand related to the same consumer - Order of the District Forum allowing the complaint upheld...........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Compensation - Prayer for enhancement - Electricity bill - Issuance of wrong and inflated bill by respondent/DVB - While allowing complaint direction given to OP to issue revised bills and award of compensation of Rs.1,000/- by the District Forum - Appellant failed to make out case as to how the relief granted by..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAJASTHAN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g) -- Electricity bill - OP respondent charged the amount from the appellant twice for the same consuming period - The same held to be an act of negligence and rendering deficient service - Respondent directed to refund the amount with interest @ 9% p.a. - Compensation of Rs. 5,000/- awarded to the appellant complainant -..........

Showing : 81-90 of 151 Results