Showing : 41-50 of 158 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 2(15)-- Disconnection of electricity connection - Electric connection in the name of owner - Nothing to show that petitioner is tenant in the premises - Electric connection not given in his name - Petitioner, thus, not a consumer - Not entitled to notice before disconnection - No direction can be issued..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 41-- Injunction suit against co-sharer - Defendant sought to be restrained from restraining the plaintiff from watering his fields from motor (tube-well) on the ground that he is joint owner in possession of the land - Electric motor/electric connection and payment of electricity bills made by the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 10-- Restoration of amenities - Landlord removed water tank and disconnected electric connection on account of non-payment of water and electricity charges by tenant - However, tenant paid these charges and interim rent - Landlord directed to restore the amenities...........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Electricity connection-- Tubewell electric connection - On priority basis as Ex - serviceman - Change of rules - Seniority of respondent - complainant changed and relegated to the lower position than the discretionary quota of the chairman of the appellant - Held that the appellants are treating the customers at their..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(3B), Electricity Act, 2003, Section 145-- Electricity supply - Electricity charges - Nonpayment - Electricity disconnection - Interim order - Interim order by District Forum in an application u/s 13(3B) of the Act for resumption of electric connection in favour of the complainant subject to payment 1/3rd of the assessed amount - Held that..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Electricity supply-- Electricity bill - Over - hauling of account - The electric connection was for domestic purpose only but the checking report reveals that the appellant was not only using this electric connection for commercial purpose but he was also using the load in excess - Not denied by the appellant that he..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Electricity connection - For running stone crusher - Commercial activity - Disconnection of supply for non - payment of electricity bill - Complaint before District Forum - The electricity connection has been taken by the petitioner for running a stone crusher which was a commercial..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Electricity connection - For running stone crusher - Commercial activity - Disconnection of supply for non - payment of electricity bill - Complaint before District Forum - Plea of the petitioner that he had taken the electricity connection for running the stone crusher for the purpose..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 126(b)-- Electricity - Consumption in premises other than for which connection is permitted - It amounts to `unauthorised use of electricity' - Adjoining plot purchased by consumer and electric connection extended - Previous owner of adjoining plot had defaulted in paying electricity bills, hence, his..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Sales Regulations of PSEB, 134.5.2.1-- Electricity bill - Raising of demand of Rs. 1,09,156/ - by Sub Divisional Officer - As per Regulation 134.5.2.1 for MS category connection SDO competent to issue demand upto Rs. 1,00,000/ - The demand raised for Rs. 1,09,156 was not raised by the competent authority, as such, the appellants itself..........

Showing : 41-50 of 158 Results