Showing : 1021-1030 of 2238 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Rent and Eviction-- Non user of suit premises for a period of six months preceding the filing of suit and that tenant is liable for eviction on ground of sub letting - Non consumption of electricity - Plea of tenant that he is a devout Jain and he closes the shop at 5.30 p.m. before the day getting dark - However,..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction - Bonafide requirement - Personal necessity - Plea of tenant that landlord is having share in ancestral property - Appellate authority found that landlord had no other property except demised shop in question - Held, eviction granted on ground of personal necessity is justified...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Eviction petition of tenant from a shop on ground of personal necessity - Proof of - Held, a NRI landlord is required to prove that (i) he is a NRI (ii) he has returned to India and required property for his use or for use of any one ordinarily living with him and dependent on him..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Eviction petition - leave to defend - Held, tenant's affidavit asking for leave to contest NRI landlord's application is required to be confined to grounds which NRI landlord has to prove...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Whether an NRI landlord, who is a co-owner in two different properties which are in occupation of the tenants, can maintain a petition u/s 13-B of the Act after filing of the petition by his co-owners as NRI in respect of the other property - Held, NRI landlord, who is co-owner in..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a)-- Eviction petition filed by landlord through attorney on ground of bona fide necessity of son to set up hospital at Jalandhar, though son already running hospital at Ludhiana - Tenant contended that landlord had renounced world and there is no evidence on record of any correspondence between..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)-- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground of impairment of value and utility of the demised premises on account of material structural alteration - Two shops let out to tenant on two different occasions - Tenant allegedly removed intervening wall between two tenanted premises - Tenant admitted in..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(iii)-- Eviction petition - Impairing value and utility - Eviction sought on ground that tenant had illegally and unauthorisedly encroached upon area by including verandah of shop after replacing shutter - Fact of extending shop by encroaching verandah proved on record - No evidence brought by tenant..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)(a), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27-- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground of sub-letting - Eviction order passed - In first appeal sub tenant sought to produce evidence to substantiate his claim that he is direct tenant - Production of additional evidence rejected by Appellate Court - Second Appeal - Held, documents which are of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 5-- Res judicata - Unauthorized occupants - Ejectment of tenant - Application for ejectment was previously dismissed on the ground that tenants were not in unauthorized and the payment of leases showed that there had been a continuation of lease and that they were tenants holding over - Thereafter,..........

Showing : 1021-1030 of 2238 Results