Showing : 81-90 of 780 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction petition - Ceased to occupy - Minimal consumption of electricity - Presumption can be drawn that during the relevant period no activity, whatsoever, was carried out by tenants to prove that they continuously resided in the demised premises...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(2)(i), (v)-- Eviction petition - Cased to occupy - Tenant without any reasonable cause ceased to occupy demised premises continuously for a period of 12 months prior to filing of petition - No evidence on record that during that period, tenants actually resided in tenanted premises which they could lead by..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 19, 38-- Rent and eviction - Suit for possession by landlord - Power of Rent Control Tribunal - Power is though limited to substantial question of law, but where finding is based on no evidence or relevant and admissible evidence is not taken into consideration or legal principles wrongly applied or..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e)-- Eviction - Will cannot be made the subject matter of challenge by tenant who cannot deny and in fact does not deny his status as tenant in suit property - Question of ownership sought to be raised by tenant would not be crucial in an eviction petition - Eviction upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)(a)-- Eviction - Sub-letting - Plea of establishment of business through partnership by tenant - Tenant contended that he had not sub-let the suit premises, in fact, he entered into partnership with petitioner no.2, who was running a business in premises - However, statement of tenant that he was..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 36-- Execution of eviction decree - Recurring infringement of decree by tenant - Second execution petition filed by subsequent purchaser - Maintainability - Tenant earlier vacated rented premises but subsequently trespassed into it - Executing Court would not become functus officio to pass second order..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- Rent and eviction - NRI landlord - Bonafide requirement - Leave to defend - Indian citizenship - Proof of - Any person who is willing to come back to India and who was born or whose parents were in manner defined, will continue to be NRI notwithstanding any assumption of citizenship of foreign..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Impleadment of party - Plea of applicant that property was rented out to two brothers whereas eviction petition is filed against only one - Application to seek impleadment filed two years after ejectment petition was filed and at a stage where landlord had led his entire evidence - Plea..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972, Section 14-- Eviction - Non-payment of rent - Payment of rent to Rent Controller instead of Landlord is not a valid payment, as neither any intimation was sent to landlord nor any request was made for withdrawal of same - It is only after expiry of statutory period of 30 days, when landlord filed an..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Building and rebuilding - Tenant contended that since landlord has not sufficient funds for reconstruction thus he cannot be evicted - Contention rejected, as petition cannot be allowed only on that point, since tenant did not cross-examine landlord when he appeared in witness box on..........

Showing : 81-90 of 780 Results