Showing : 41-50 of 728 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
H.P.Urban Rent Control Act, 1987,, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9,10-- Rent and eviction - All the co-owners in an eviction petition seeking eviction on the ground of reconstruction of building are necessary party - In case one co-owner is allowed to raise construction without consent of other co-owners by way of judicial order then legal rights of other co-owners..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(3)(c)-- Eviction order on ground of reconstruction of building - Tenant has right of re-induction in the building reconstructed by landlord on payment of rent to be settled taking into consideration the rent of similar space prevalent in the market...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(3)(c)-- Eviction - Bonafide requirement of premises for re-construction - Eviction sought for raising construction of first floor as it is not possible to raise construction of first floor on the existing structure - Reconstruction is for making provision for additional accommodation - No prejudice is..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Uttar Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972, Section 4, 18, Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971, Rule 5(2)-- Rent and eviction - In the instant case, complaint filed against petitioners regarding unauthorised occupation of shops belonging to defence - To negate charges against them, petitioner claimed to be tenants of Nagar Nigam - Estate Officer denied plea of petitioners being tenants of Nagar Nigam -..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Non-residential building - Landlord contended that building in question is no, residential building and had rented out the premises to tenant for commercial purposes to run clinic, however, tenant converted the same into residential premises - Evidence on record shows that tenant used..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Hyderbad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, Section 32, 38D, A.P.(TA) Protected Tenants (Transfer of Ownership of Lands) Rules, 1973, Rule 4, 5-- Rent and eviction - Protected tenant - Termination of tenancy - In absence of valid termination of protected tenancy interest of protect tenant continues to be operative and subsisting in law and even such interest can devolve on his legal heirs and representatives who can claim restoration of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlady divorcee - Divorcee, if intends to move on in her life and stand on her own feet, especially when she has premises available to her which on eviction can be utilised for said purpose, it cannot be said that it is not a bona fide necessity of landlady...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 116-- Estoppel - Denial of landlord's title - Eviction suit - Tenant in his written statement though denied ownership of landlord but in his cross-examination admitted title of landlord - He further admitted that he used to pay rent in the name of father of landlord - Tenant without any doubt regarded..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of six and half months in filling appeal - Petitioner was tenant in premises and petitioner was in arrears of rent which were not paid during pendency of rent petition - Suit for recovery against petitioner was decreed and petitioner has preferred appeal against..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second appeal - Eviction order - Extension of time to vacate - Defendant/tenant not assailing the judgment on merits, as he only wanted six months time to vacate the suit premises - However, when the defendant does not want to pay mesne profits as per the impugned judgment passed on merits,..........

Showing : 41-50 of 728 Results