Showing : 31-36 of 36 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)-- Eviction petition - Bona fide need - 80 years old landlord sought eviction of tenant on ground that he needs separate house because for 3/4 years he was not getting proper care from his daughter-in-law and was unable to live in a house where atmosphere of house has become suffocating because of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 2-- Attorney - Evidence as regards personal knowledge - (a) An attorney holder who has signed the plaint and instituted the suit, but has no personal knowledge of the transaction can only give formal evidence about the validity of the power of attorney and the filing of the suit; (b) If the attorney..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide requirement - Shop - Required for unmarried daughter to start a Coaching Academy - Eviction petition filed through son-in-law in whose favour power of attorney executed - It is the age of the landlord or the hardship which the daughter had to face in attending Courts at Khanna which led..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide requirement - Landlady 85 years of age had strained relations with her daughter-in-law - Premises required for personal bonafide necessity - Because of old age, one is not disqualified from self respect and dignity - Old age cannot be construed to be age of dependency - It is not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction - Bonafide requirement - Landlords son doing practice in Medical profession in Panchkula in a residential house - Landlords daughter-in-law a doctor in Govt. service - Landlord filed eviction petition from shop-cum-flat at Chandigarh so that his son and daughter-in-law could practice..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Rent and Eviction-- Bona fide requirement of landlord for business of son - During pendency of proceedings other shop fell vacant - Same given to daughter-in-law of landlord - Not stated that her need was greater than business of son - No explanation as to why it was not found suitable for business of son - Held,..........

Showing : 31-36 of 36 Results