Showing : 71-80 of 221 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Section 21(l)(a)-- Tenant - U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules 1972, R. 16(2) - Eviction - Application for release u/s 21(1) (a) the Act - Factors to be considered - (a) length of tenancy; (b) Availability of suitable accommodation for tenant; (c) Landlords existing business is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 7-- Quite notice - Found invalid - Service of summons of the suit for eviction of tenant showing categorical intention of the landlord asking tenant to vacate the tenanted premises can be taken as notice - Starting date for calculation of mesne profits in both the eventualities will be different - In..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Rent & Eviction-- Eviction order - Tenant liable to pay mesne profits for use and occupation of the premises from the date of decree of eviction - Mesne profits is payable at the same rate at which landlord would have been able to let out the premises on being vacated by the tenant - While determining the quantum..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9-- Local investigation - Eviction proceedings - Held, provisions of O.26.R.9 CPC while empowering Court with discretion to direct a local investigation for the purpose of "elucidating the matter in dispute" only provides for Court to make local investigation where Court is not clear with regard to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)- - Eviction - Bonafide requirement - Held, it is bonafide necessity of landlord which has to be looked into and not that of tenant - It is for landlord to decide as to which of shop is required by him for his personal necessity as he is the best judge of his need and tenant cannot dictate his terms..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13, East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Bona fide requirement - Eviction petition on ground of bona fide need for doing a particular business in demised property - Plea by tenant that landlord does not have any previous experience and is not qualified for the same - Held, even if landlord is not having requisite..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1983, Section 12-- Eviction - Recovery of possession - Tenant compromised eviction suit with landlord and agreed to vacate suit premises within stipulated period as reported in the compromise decree - Tenant did not vacate suit premises within stipulated time - Execution filed - In Execution present petitioner..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Rent and Eviction-- Enhancement of rent - Guidelines and norms for enhancement of rent - (i) Tenant must enhance rent in accordance with terms of agreement or ; (ii) Tenant must enhance rent at least by ten percent after every three years; (iii) If rent is too low in comparison to market rent and rent was fixed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(6)-- Eviction petition on the ground that demise premises have become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - During pendency of eviction petition, compromise effected - As per compromise, tenant would vacate demise premises which shall be demolished and reconstructed by landlords in which tenant would..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Rent and Eviction-- Ceased to occupy - It is on the date of filing of the petition that Rent Controller has come to a finding that tenant had ceased to occupy the premises continuously for a period of six month without reasonable cause - Improvement in the financial health of appellant after many years cannot impinge..........

Showing : 71-80 of 221 Results