Showing : 641-650 of 2091 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Section 10-- Eviction - Payment of rent - Willful default - Proof - Defaulted period not disputed by petitioner/tenant - Only defence taken by him is that as per sale agreement he can pay rent in lump sum at the time of execution of sale deed and therefore, default was not willful - But there were three more..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Section 10, 18-- Eviction - Execution proceedings - Abuse of process - Order of eviction passed in favour of landlady confirmed by High Court - SLP filed by tenant dismissed by Apex Court and time was granted to tenant to vacate demised premises subject to filling of affidavit of undertaking - Tenant failed to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964, Rule 12(4), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- - Eviction proceedings - Petitioners' prayer that they should not be dispossessed till a scheme is framed or application u/Rule.12(4) of the 1964 Rules is decided - Held, prayer is pre-mature as no order of eviction has been passed against petitioners - Even if an order of eviction is passed,..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Re-building and Re-construction - Courts below recorded concurrent finding of fact that building being old, in a dilapidated condition, needs to be reconstructed, its structure is wooden in nature, and it cannot be said to be safe for human habitation - Contention that building plans..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Proof - After coming to firm conclusion that relationship of landlord and tenant existed between parties, Courts below examined other questions with regard to bona fide necessity and ordered ejectment - Admittedly, petitioner has two sons - He rented out premises way..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Title dispute - Dispute of title between co-owners - Same is stated to be pending in second appeal - Held, pendency of such appeal would have no bearing on eviction proceedings - Eviction proper - Petition dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 18, 23A, East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949, Rule 16(ii), Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 4, 5-- Eviction proceedings - Mushtarka Malkan - Land in dispute recorded as Mushtarka Malkan i.e. land created after applying pro rata cut on holdings of proprietors - Held, land so created and reserved vests in Gram Panchayat for its control and management - Gram Panchayat has right to seek eviction of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)(b)-- Eviction - Not occupying any other rented land - Confined only to such of those buildings which are bound to be disclosed and state as to how they are not fit for his occupation...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)(b)-- Eviction - Not occupying any other rented land - If only there is yet another non residential building, which is vacant that can be occupied by the landlord or there is yet another non residential building which he had vacated only in order to claim ejectment, it could be stated that the landlord..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)(b)-- Eviction order - Sufficient time to vacate - Tenant carrying on business for several decades and if he be made to vacate, he will be put to great hardship - Tenant to vacate within 12 months on condition that he gives an undertaking before the Court that he will pay an amount of Rs.1,000/- pm. and..........

Showing : 641-650 of 2091 Results