Showing : 791-800 of 2211 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(i)-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Landlady intends to start business by settling her son - Held, tenant cannot be allowed to dictate terms to landlord as to his or her requirements regarding property that is required for bona fide use and occupation - It is landlady's prerogative to do what she deems..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 108(p)-- Permanent structure - Removal of roof and replacement thereof by concrete slab - Held, concrete slab is permanent feature of demised premises and could not be easily removed without doing extensive damage to remaining structure - Alteration made by tenant fell within mischief of S.108(p) of the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Section 20(4)- - Eviction - First date of hearing - Held, effective date of first hearing of suit should be when Court proposed to apply its mind...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Section 30(1), 20(4)- - Eviction - Tender of rent - Written statement was filed on 25.07.1995 and 24.08.1995 was fixed as first date of hearing - Due to holiday matter was taken up on 25.08.1995 - Tenant deposited amount upto 25.08.1995 - Held, tenant not liable to be evicted - Petition dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide requirement - Held, a landlord who is himself in occupation of only a tenanted premise and who gave evidence to the effect that he has taken only a temporary accommodation till he secures eviction of his own premise, there is nothing to suspect his bona fides - Eviction proper..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Change of user - Held, if landlord had let property for residential use only and moment Court finds that tenant's contention that it is no, residential property is not correct then there is a ground established for eviction that tenant is guilty of change of user - Eviction proper -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 15(6)-- Eviction - Ex parte order - Execution proceedings - Objection taken by petitioner/tenant that he was not served in main eviction petition - Tenant was in fact proceeded ex-parte way back on 04.04.2006 - After a long time eviction order was passed against him - Held, it is not believable that..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 15(6)-- Eviction - Execution proceeding - Tenant's plea that landlord/decree holder is not his landlord and thus eviction petition was not maintainable - Held, challenge to maintainability of proceeding itself can be made in main ejectment proceedings and not in execution application - Executing Court..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Section 16(4), Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972, Rule 14- - Eviction - Order passed under old Act of 1947 - Held, a decision made under old Act of 1947, even if not given effect to, can be enforced u/s.16(4) and (5) of Act of 1972 - Orders passed under Act of 1947 are not redundant but shall be kept and enforced under corresponding provisions of Act of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 114, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting to Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972, Section 30- - Eviction - It is admitted by parties that Act of 1972 is not applicable to accommodation in question - Held, question of giving any benefit of deposit made u/s.30 thereof cannot arise - Such benefit cannot be extended to tenant - A tenant cannot claim double protection - Either he can claim..........

Showing : 791-800 of 2211 Results