Showing : 10481-10490 of 20274 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Accused arrested about 14 days of incident - Accused kept the blood stained pant safely so as to hand it over to the investigation officer - Held, no sane person will keep and preserve incriminating evidence with him for such a long period and after the incident..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15, 3(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25, 26-- Murder committed by five accused who were terrorists - Two accused expired and out of remaining three only one accused could be arrested and tried for the offences under TADA and S.302 IPC - Eye witnesses resiled and declared hostile - Accused made confession u/s 15 of TADA - Accused can be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 3-- Murder - Post mortem not conducted - Victim was a political leader - Angry mob did not allow Police to conduct post mortem - Adverse inference not drawn - There was good evidence that deceased died of the bullet injuries almost immediately after he was fired...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Additional accused - Summoning of - Informant from the very beginning alleged that the investigating Police Officer has not recorded statements of witnesses honestly being influenced by accused persons - There is categorical allegations made by the witness in his evidence against petitioner and..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Housing - Flats construction project - Investment made to the tune of full price of flat - Guaranteed returns promised for a period of five years and after five years buy back of the said flat assured - Construction of flats not started by OP and after sometime cheques of guaranteed amount started..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1), 2(g), 14(1)(d), Marine Insurance Act, 1963, Section 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Insurable interest - Repudiation of claim on the ground that respondent have no insurable interest - Agreement between complainant and Women and Child Welfare Department, Govt. of Rajasthan vide which the complainant was authorized to get the goods insured which was..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction petition - Unfit and unsafe - Findings of both Courts below that building is in a dilapidated condition - Municipal Committee issued a notice for demolition of building - Plea of tenant that report of surveyor appointed in this behalf is more convincing and reliable not acceptable in view..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Contentions raised by defendant purely mixed questions of law and facts which cannot possibly be determined without adducing evidence by the parties - All the arguments now sought to be raised on behalf of the defendant not at all relevant at this stage and the same may be..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32-- Two dying declarations - Not in consonance with each other - When two dying declarations are contrary to each other and not compatible with each other, then convicting a person would be hazardous...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 25-- Remand - Power of appellate court to remand - If there is sufficient evidence to decide the case on merits, then it becomes statutory duty of appellate court to decide the case on merits - Appellate court cannot straight away resort to O.41.R.25 of the Code to pass an order of remand - Order of..........

Showing : 10481-10490 of 20274 Results