Showing : 11-20 of 69 Results

HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 61, 62, 64, 91, 92-- Contents of a document - Once document is admitted in evidence, contents of that document are also liable to be treated as admitted in evidence though contents may not be conclusive evidence of fact...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92-- Application for leading evidence and summoning of witnesses - Written agreement - Oral evidence cannot be adduced for the purpose of varying the contract - Moreso there is no requirement to examine the witnesses as agreement has already been admitted by the complainant - Application rightly..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92-- Written contract - Normally contents of a written contract cannot be permitted to be varied by setting up some oral contract...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92-- Distinction between proviso 1 and 4 - Analysed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92-- Proviso 1 - Oral evidence - Admissibility - Documents never intended to be acted upon as it was a loan transaction, which was orally entered into between parties though it is not so recorded in the documents - Matter therefore, clearly covered by Proviso 1 thus it is permissible by Court to take..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92-- Proviso 1 - Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement - Plea to invalidate any document proved in accordance with S.91 of Evidence Act is available, where a case is made out of fraud, intimidation, illegality, want of due execution, want of capacity in any contracting party, want or failure of..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92-- Proviso 2 - Parol evidence - Admissibility - Where a contract or disposition not required by law to be reduced into writing has been arrived at orally then existence of any distinct subsequent oral agreement modifying or rescinding the said contract or disposition can be substantiated by parol..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 12, Rule 6, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92-- Judgment on admission and rejection of counter claim - Defendant executed sale deed in favour of plaintiff - Admission with regard to execution and registration of sale deed is clear and unequivocal - Defence of defendant barred by Ss.91 & 92 Evidence Act, has to be ignored - Held, once the title..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92-- Registered sale deed - Neither party can claim that the terms of sale such as consideration, or the nature of transaction/disposition is, in fact, different from that contained in the document itself...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92-- Document required by law to be in writing - No evidence of any oral agreement between the parties for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to, or subtracting from its terms shall be admitted, though there are exceptions to both the provisions of Ss.91 & 92 of the Act...........

Showing : 11-20 of 69 Results